Summary: 1) Overview Of The Acr And The Autonomy Of Ls And Cs
- This + 400k other summaries
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Read the summary and the most important questions on 1) Overview of the ACR and the Autonomy of Ls and Cs
-
1 1) Overview of the ACR
This is a preview. There are 36 more flashcards available for chapter 1
Show more cards here -
In Brief - 1.1. Duty of Competence
L must provide competent representation to a C. -
1.3. Duty of Diligence - In Brief
L has an obligation to "Act with reasonable diligence and promptness while representing a C." -
The Fiduciary Principle (L's Fiduciary Duties)
Under agency law, in representing a C, a L has a duty to use competence, diligence good judgment, loyalty (refrain from representing conflicting interests) to carry out the objectives of the representation, always keeping C's interest first. L must also avoid the disclosure or misuse of C's confidential information -
R on the Division of Labor int the ACR
ABA 1.2(a). -
ABA 1.2(a) - Division of Labor
1.2(a) requires L [1] to honor the C's decisions regarding the objectives of the rep and [2] to consult with C (but not necessarily get C's permission) regarding the means by which C's objectives are to be pursued. -
Name that comment: L has authority over technical, legal, and tactical matters (whether to depose a witness or rely on an informal interview), but C has a right to make decisions about matters such as the expense to be incurred and concern for 3rd parties who might be adversely affected
1.2, CMT 2 -
ABA R: Within certain limits, L and C can agree to modify/limit the scope of the rep
1.2(c). -
Under agency law, what do Ls have implied authority to do
Ls have implied authority to speak on C's behalf and to enter intro agreements w/ others w/ C's consent. Within lawful boundaries, L have implied authority to bind Cs. -
ABA R: A L cannot counsel a C to engage in criminal or fraudulent conduct, or assist C in doing something that L knows is criminal or fraudulent
1.2(d). -
Additionally, logic would probably dictate that C has authority to decide
Decisions that are "comparable" to the decision to settle a civil case or plea in a criminal case- Whether to appeal
- whether to enter into a stipulation
- Whether to consent to the entry of summary judgment
- Waiving defenses
- Selling real property
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding