Overview of the ACR

23 important questions on Overview of the ACR

Jones v Barnes (US 1983); Olfe v Gordon and the allocation of authority

L is generally not required to obtain C's permission when he makes decisions that appear to concern only means, but are vital to the outcome of the matter. Jones v Barnes. (recognizing that, in order to be a successful advocate, L may sometimes refuse to do a thing that C desires, such a s including myriad frivolous grounds for reversal in an appeal).

Yet, the better course is to involve C in the deisionmaking process. Some cases have held that it is a violation of L's fiduciary duty to fail to follow C's explicit instructions. See Olfe v Gordon

ABA R requiring L to consult with C regarding "means"

1.2(a)


ABA - C's Authority. 1.2(a) + 1.2, CMT 1

Over the objectives of the rep, including expenses to be incurred and effects on 3rd parties who might be adversely affected. Also, specifically: in civil cases, whether to settle; in criminal cases, whether to plead guilty, waive jury trial, or take the stand. 1.2(a), 1.2, CMT 1
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

ABA - L's Authority. 1.2(a), (d), and 1.2 CMT

  • L presumptively has authority over the means by which the objectives of the rep are to be pursued, including technical, legal, and tactical matters. 1.2(a).

  • L's authority is not absolute, but subject to a duty to consult w/ C. 1.2, CMT 2.

  • L may not counsel or assist C in committing a criminal or fraudulent act. 1.2(d).

ABA - Agreements altering the scope of the rep?

1.2(c)

ABA - definition of consent "confirmed in writing

1.0(B)

Define consent "confirmed in writing." 1.0(b)

Consent may start out as oral, but must be subsequently set down in writing and transmitted to the person giving consent. 1.0(b).

Oral Consent will suffice when

If written or "confirmed in writing" consent is not specifically required, consent may be oral - but written evidence is always good

Rules where no consent is permitted (nonwaivable duties): 5 listed

  1. 1.7(b). Some concurrent rep conflicts
  2. 1.8(c). Preparation of an instrument conveying a substantial gift to L
  3. 1.8(d). Acquisition of media rights in subject of rep
  4. 1.8(e), (i). Providing financial assistance to C or acquiring an interest in the subject matter of litigation.
  5. 1.8(j). Sexual relationships with Cs.

Rules where written consent is required: 2 listed

  1. 1.5(C). Terms of a contingent fee arrangement.
  2. 1.8(a). Business transactions with Cs.

Rules where consent "confirmed in writing" is required: 1 general statement

Most ordinary concurrent and successive conflicts of interest. See 1.7(b)(4), 1.9(a), 1.11(a)(2).

Where informed consent (may be oral) is required: 4 listed

  1. 1.2(c). Limitation on the scope of the rep
  2. 1.6(a), 1.8(b). Disclosure or adverse use of conf info
  3. 1.15(a). Keeping C funds in a state other than where L's office is located

Where notice alone (not consent) is required: 3 listed

  1. 1.10(a)(2)(ii). Screen is employed to protect former C conf info in moving-L conflicts situation.
  2. 1.11(b)(2). Screen employs in former government L conflict situation.
  3. 1.12(b). Law clerk negotiating for employment w/ a party or a party's L (notice only to judge required).

Where c must be given an opportunity to consult with independent counsel and written advice to C stating as much: 2 listed

  1. 1.8(a)(1). Business transactions with Cs.
  2. 1.8(h)(2). Settlement of malpractice claims brought by former or current Cs

Where C must actually receive representation from independent counsel: 1 listed

  1. 1.8(h)(1). Prospective limits on L's liability (i.e., malpractice).

ABA R on Duty to communicate?

1.4

Under 1.4, L has a duty to:

  1. Keep C reasonably informed about the status of the matter
  2. provide information to C when requested
  3. give C sufficient information so that C can make decisions about the rep, where necessary

Identify ABA R: "L must inform C of any decision/circumstance for which C's informed consent is required"

1.4(a)(1).

Under 1.4(a)(2)--requiring L to consult w/ C regarding means--what should L do where C + L disagree

If L and C disagree as to means, L should continue to consult w/ C to reach a mutually agreeable solution. 1.2, CMT 2; 1.4, CMT 3. If it is a sufficiently serious disagreement, L may withdraw under 1.6(b)(3).

Identify ABA R: 'A L must keep C reasonably informed about the status of the matter.'

1.4(a)(3).

In plain english, what does 1.4(a)(3)--requiring L to keep C reasonably informed about matter--L to do

L must, on his own initiative, periodically update C on how things are going, but L need not await C's advice or instructions on how to proceed.

Identify the ABA R: 'L must comply w/ C's reaosnable requests for information'

1.4(a)(4).

Note that L doesn't have to respond to unreasonable requests for information, but client-relations considerations should motivate L to keep C informed

Identify the ABA R: "A L must consult with [inform] C about any relevant limitation imposed on L's conduct by the ethical rules or other law.

1.5(a)(5).

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo