Summary: 5) Legal Fees

Study material generic cover image
  • This + 400k other summaries
  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
PLEASE KNOW!!! There are just 44 flashcards and notes available for this material. This summary might not be complete. Please search similar or other summaries.
Use this summary
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo

Read the summary and the most important questions on 5) Legal Fees

  • 1 5) Legal Fees

    This is a preview. There are 34 more flashcards available for chapter 1
    Show more cards here

  • Name 2 types of claims by which L Fees can be challenged.

    1) Contract Law Challenges. 2) DR Challenges
  • Model Code v. Model Rules

    Model Code prohibited Ls form charging "clearly excessive fees." However, both ("unreasonable" + "clearly excessive") are defined by reference to the same 8 factors (identical).
  • Identify ABA provisions: Which define "unreasonable" fees?

    1.5(a)(1)-(8)
  • 1.5(a)(1). Nature of the Matter - In plain English

    L chan charge a higher hourly rate for services that require a great deal of skill, are permitted to spend more time on a complex case, etc
  • 1.5(a)(2). Opportunity Costs [which L must forego] - In plain English 

    In some cases, Ls should be able to charge the C a premium for foregoing other sources of business
  • 1.5(a)(3). Local Custom - In plain English

    Although not dispositive, a fee may raise eyebrows if it way out of line with what other LS in the jurisdiction charge for similar services. See in Re Fordham (Mass 1996).
  • 1.5(a)(4). The Stakes for the Client - In plain English

    It is reasonable to charge a higher fee when something of great importance is on the line. See  Brobeck (US 1979)
  • 1.5(a)(5). Emergencies - In plain English

    A L can charge a premium over his normal rates to compensate for the hassle, sleepless nights, or a disruption in his other business
  • 1.5(a)(6). One-Shot v. Repeat Clients - In plain English

    One-Shot Clients. If C comes to L with a one time only matter, L may have an incentive to milk the matter for all its worth, thinking that C is unlikely to place future business with L anyway. 

    Repeat Clients. If the C has previously used L, L can be trusted because he is unlikely to over-reach and bill excessively on only 1 matter, in fear of losing C's future business
  • 1.5(a)(7). You Get What You Pay For - In plain English

    One would expect to pay more for a senior partner than a junior associate ($experience). BUT do not overstate the latitude that an experience, skillful, or renowned L has in billing Cs. If L is billing by the hour, the rate is same whether he is mindless organizing documents or coming up with brilliant ideas. See In re Fordham (Mass 1996). **But note, Ls should not be billing many hours for tasks that are typically delegated to non-legal employees (paralegals, secretaries)
PLEASE KNOW!!! There are just 44 flashcards and notes available for this material. This summary might not be complete. Please search similar or other summaries.

To read further, please click:

Read the full summary
This summary +380.000 other summaries A unique study tool A rehearsal system for this summary Studycoaching with videos
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Topics related to Summary: 5) Legal Fees