Summary: 6. Free Movement Of Capital And Payments
- This + 400k other summaries
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Read the summary and the most important questions on 6. Free movement of capital and payments
-
1 Introduction
-
What are the three fundamentals when it comes to fundamental freedom of capitals acc. To art. 63-66 TFEU?
Liberalisation ofcapital as factor of production- Movement of capital between MS and between MS and third countries
- Benefit for lawfully established capital
-
2 Scope
-
We also have a prohibition of restrictions of the free movement of capital. This is in cases 286/82 and 26/83 Luisi and Carbone. What are the two different capitals and give some examples?
Movements of capital - financialoperations essentially concerned withinvestment of funds
- monetary capital:securities , loans, sureties
- real capital: real estateinvestments , stake incompanies -
We also have a prohibition of restrictions of the free movement of payments. What is the most important transfer and give some examples?
-Transfer of money: cash,transactions ,cheque , bill, as aremuneration inexercising one of the otherfundamental freedoms .
Bothprohibitions apply betweenMS and with thirdcountries -
ECJ joined cases 286/82 and 26/83, judgement of 21 Jan 1984, Luisi and Carbone. What were the facts of the case?
Italy limited export of foreigncurrencies for use in a foreign country to500.000 lira.Italians Luisi andCarbone hadcollected foreigncurrencies amounting to a couple of million lira which theyintended to use in otherMS fortouristic purposes and for medicaltreatment .Italian authorities imposes fines.ECJ : Do these facts fall under freemovement of capital or freemovement of payments?
-
ECJ joined cases 286/82 and 26/83, judgement of 21 Jan 1984, Luisi and Carbone. What was the decision of the ECJ?
- Current payments are foreign currency transfers constituting a consideration for the provision of a service or transfer of a good -> movement of payments
- movement of capital are financial operations essentially concerned with the investment of funds inquisition and not a remuneration ef for a service
- physical transfer of bank notes, movements of capital where transfer corresponds to an obligation to pay arising from a transaction involving the movement of goods or services
- controls lawful, but may not effect the "the normal pattern of provision of services"
- Current payments are foreign currency transfers constituting a consideration for the provision of a service or transfer of a good -> movement of payments
-
We have also a prohibition in discrimination. On what grounds?
- On grounds of country of origin or destination of capital
- Open and disguised (interest discounts for construction with domestic banks only)
- tax reductions only for income from investments in respective country
- Non-discriminatory rules
- On grounds of country of origin or destination of capital
-
ECJ case C-483/99, judgement of 4 June 2002 COM/France. What were the facts of the case? Is there discrimination?
- France has adopted rules for a state-held special share of the company Société national Elf-Aquitaine, which supplied France with petroleum products
- The share allowed for the following special rights for France:
- larger direct or indirect investments were subject to prior authorization by French minister of economic affairs.
- Veto right against decisions about the cession of the majority capital of the four subsidiaries or about its use as a surety
- France has adopted rules for a state-held special share of the company Société national Elf-Aquitaine, which supplied France with petroleum products
-
ECJ case C-483/99, judgement of 4 June 2002 COM/France. What was the decision of the ECJ? Is there discrimination?
- No discrimination, but acquisition of shares may be prevented and investors may be impeded to invest in this company. This measure may render free movement of capital illusory
- Justification: public security; necessity requirement not met.
- No discrimination, but acquisition of shares may be prevented and investors may be impeded to invest in this company. This measure may render free movement of capital illusory
-
ECJ case C-112/05, judgement of 23 Oct 2007, COM/Germany. What were the facts of the case? Is there discrimination?
- VW law in Germany:
- limits the voting rights of each shareholder to max. Of 20% of VW's share capital
- Federal state and Land Lower Saxony were entitled to appoint two representatives each to the company's supervisory board, as long as they own a share
- requires a majority of 80% of shares represented for certain resolutions of general assembly of shareholders (normally: 75%)
- VW law in Germany:
-
ECJ case C-112/05, judgement of 23 Oct 2007, COM/Germany. What was the decision of the ECJ? Is there discrimination?
- VW law is a national measure
- prerogatives of FRG/Land Lower Saxony allow significant influence in spite of low investments
- Unlawful restriction of movement of capital -> may impede direct investments (chilling effects)
- VW law is a national measure
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding