The modal auxiliaries

12 important questions on The modal auxiliaries

What are the grammatical properties that define the class of modal auxiliaries?

Modal auxiliaries have distinct properties such as:
  1. Only tensed forms; no plain, gerund-participle, or past participle.
  2. Invariable in present tense.
  3. License following infinitival Complement without "to" (except OUGHT).

When do NEED and DARE function as auxiliaries?

NEED and DARE act as auxiliaries when followed by:
1. Infinitival construction without "to".
Examples:
  • Need I bother?
  • I daren't tell them.

What are some examples of NEED and DARE as lexical verbs?

As lexical verbs, examples include:
  1. I need a haircut.
  2. I need to get my hair cut.
  3. I dare you to repeat that.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What is a key exception regarding modal auxiliaries and "to"?

The key exception is OUGHT:
  1. Modal auxiliaries typically license following infinitival Complements without "to".
  2. OUGHT requires "to": They ought to accept the offer.

Why is the use of HAVE in "We have to invite them all" not considered a modal auxiliary?

In "We have to invite them all," HAVE:
  1. Does not exhibit the three grammatical properties of modal auxiliaries.
  2. Functions as a static verb rather than an auxiliary.

What are the preterite forms of CAN, MAY, WILL, and SHALL, and how do their uses differ in Present-day English?

The preterite forms are:
  • Could (CAN)
  • Might (MAY)
  • Would (WILL)
  • Should (SHALL)
Only could and would indicate past time; might and should are conditional or reported speech uses.

What is the primary use of the modal auxiliaries in terms of preterite forms?

The primary use includes:
  1. Could and would: basic preterite for past time
  2. Might and should: conditional constructions, reported thought
  3. More tentative in usage

How are modal meanings categorized, and what are the three major types?

Modal meanings are categorized as:
  1. EPISTEMIC MODALITY: necessity, likelihood, possibility
  2. DEONTIC MODALITY: requirements, permissions
  3. DYNAMIC MODALITY: abilities, dispositions

How can modal sentences exhibit ambiguity in meaning?

Ambiguity examples:
  • “You must be tactful” can be:
  • - Epistemic: an inferring statement
  • - Deontic: a directive statement
  • “She can't be serious” can mean inability or inference.

What distinguishes the use of might and should from other preterite forms?

Distinctions include:
  • Used in conditional constructions
  • Found in reported speech where present forms do not apply
  • More frequent in modal auxiliaries compared to others

How does the meaning in modal auxiliaries vary based on their type?

The variation includes:
  • EPISTEMIC: inferring necessity or possibility
  • DEONTIC: expressing requirements
  • DYNAMIC: indicating abilities or willingness

In what contexts do might and should exhibit their preterite status?

Their preterite status is observed in:
  1. Conditional scenarios
  2. Reported thoughts
  3. Situations where present tense cannot be used

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo