Generating research questions through problematization ALVESSON AND SANDBERG
7 important questions on Generating research questions through problematization ALVESSON AND SANDBERG
Why is a good problem statement crucial for good research?
What is the traditional way of how to formulate a problem statement?
--> Researchers scan for overlooked areas, or search for shortages of particular theory/ perspective in existing literature and base their research questions based on that
What is the way Alvesson and Sandberg think of how to formulate a problem statement?
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
What is the main issue of the traditional method?
(GAP-spotting and problematization are not mutally exclusive)
What are the four steps in the problematization method?
- Describe the challenging assumptions of the underlying existing literature /fields
- Elaborate which assumptions are to be challenges (typology)
- Develop method to execute the challange
- Examine how the method can be applied to articles, then discuss possibilities within the literature
What is the difference between GAP-spotting and problematization?
What are the six principles for challenging assumptions?
- Identify a domain for investigation
- Identify assumptions within the domain
- Evaluate assumption
- Develop alternative assumptions
- Consider assumptions in relation to audience
- Evaluate alternative assumptions
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding