Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing: Critical issues

19 important questions on Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing: Critical issues

Explain the term ecological validity

Eological validity of neuropsychological tests refers to functional and predictive relationship between patient performance on a test and their behavior home/work/school

Name 2 major approaches to enhance ecological validity

1. utilize tests that mimic demands patients everyday functioning (verisimilitude)

2. using NP tests that correlate with everyday or work functioning (veridicality)

Explain verisimilitude in light of ecological validity of NP assessment and an issue associated with it

data obtained from test accurately reflects demands of patient environment.  NP uses test designed to detect brain damage instead of functioning in environment
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Explain veridicality in light of ecological validity of NP assessment

linking results NPO to for example questionnaires or evaluations of work how one is functioning in its work setting. Issue is if outcome measure reflects functioning in real-world

How is the worksetting of a pt. related to his strengths and deficits

Depending on patients strengths and deficits, demand of worksetting may compensate or exacerbate cognitive or behavioral impairments

Why is it important for a NP to obtain information about demand characteristics of pt environment

Info helps understand strengths or impairments, goals, objectives, premorbid skills, abilities, attitudes, awareness impairment, biological system (medical conditions). Prediction functioning patient in environment based only on NPO likely not accurate.

What is a major problem in ecological validity with environment of testing?

environment of testing had often no resemblance to real-world settings (tests often highly structured, quiet) also examiner is often patient, gentle and calm manners. This is all not the case in real-world settings.

What is ment by conditionality in the paper by Sbordone (2008)?

Under right conditions, people are capable of doing a lot, until conditions change. If a patient is provided a highly structured work setting, even though their result suggest impaired, they will be able to function adequately

What causes a problem with ecological validity of pt. completing a questionnaire about complaints? How can this be solved?

Pt. often have little self-awareness.  Presence of family can shed light on symptoms and improve ecological validity

What assumptions are held by some NP which cause difficulty in translating data to real-world settings?

Assumptions that background information may bias them in testing. Observation and other sources of data (medical recors, historical data) is irrelevant according to them

How is, according to Sbordone (2008) NP testing currently used?

1. Identify strengths and deficits of cognitive functioning
2. Determining whether brain damage is sustained

Name 2 limitations of NP testing suggested by Sbordone (2008)

1. Assuming test performance provide reliable information about cognitive functioning

2. Many cognitive deficits go undetected because NP rely on standardized neuropsychological tests    

Is the use of IQ tests promoted by Sbordone (2008)? Explain.

No.  these tests are typically insensitive to deficits caused by brain damage.

Name confounding factors for poor performance on testing

prior brain injury
neurological conditions
seizures
acute pain
symptoms secondary to injuries
illness
sleep
fatigue
alcohol drug abuse
medications
psychiatric illness
stressors
motivation or malingering
negative interactions examiner
cultural
tests
practice effects

Why are neuropsychological tests poor in assessing functioning of the frontal lobes of brain

Tests too simplistic for frontal lobes
Patients with damage to medial orbital frontal lobes often exhibit loss of motivation, energy, and drive, pleasure, depression, psychomotor retardation, change eating habits, loss sex drive, curiosity and obsessive compulsive behavior. Patients above will deny symptoms and test within normal ranges but exhibit dramatic change in personality. Not observed by NP because spending little time with patient
 

Name personality changes often associated with frontal lobe damage.

1. Often unable to regulate emotions
2. Egocentricity
Poor frustration tolerance
Mood swings

Explain why NP tests are poor in assessing executive functions of the brain?

Individual performs novel problem-solving task from inception to completion
Includes awareness that problem exists, evaluation of problem, analysis of conditions of problem, formulation of goals to solve problem, evaluation effectiveness of plans, selection and initiation of plan, evaluation of progress plan, modification of plan, replacing plan if necessary, terminating plan when conditions of problem have satisfied, storing plan, retrieving later.  Tests usually inaccurately test executive functioning because tests do only assess one step of all steps involved in executive functioning

Explain the vector analysis approach to determine ecological validity of test data

If the information from other sources (observation, history etc) forms a vector with neuropsychological tests data, there is a high probability that the data is ecologically valid.

What are important predictors in predicting future job succes following mild TBI?

Pre-existing history of dependability, absenteeism, manage frustration and length of employment and age

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo