Antisocial and aggressive behavior - Schonenberg & Justyte (2014) facial cues in antisocial violent offenders
13 important questions on Antisocial and aggressive behavior - Schonenberg & Justyte (2014) facial cues in antisocial violent offenders
How is the hostile attribution bias defined
What is the research problem of this study
aggressive individuals attribute hostile intent in ambiguous situations but there is no clear evidence if that holds true for facial cues.
What is the aim of present study
the study wants to gain insight into the decision making process, by creating choice decision task in which individuals have to indicate the perceived intensity level of each displayed expression
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Which variables did this study assessed
What is expected if hostile response bias holds in this study
What were the participants of this study
55 control groups
How did they measure the aim of this study
- mini international neuropsychiatric interview
- AVO (PPI-R); which assesses self reported psychopathic traits
- ambivalence task
What were the results of this study on the response bias
This effect was most prominent in the ambivalent intensity levels
What were the results of perceived intensity ratings
What is the discussion of this research
hostile attribution bias depends on the presence of subtle angry faces features in presented stimuli
What does the developmental model posits
What does this study suggest in the discussion
What is the face perception bias
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding