Social Perception and Attribution - Attribution theory - Correspondent inference theory
3 important questions on Social Perception and Attribution - Attribution theory - Correspondent inference theory
What does the correspondent inference theory say about how observers work out the causes for observed intentional behavior?
What 2 things does an observer do in the process of analysis of non-common effects to work out the causes for an actor's choice/action?
- Identifying the distinctive outcomes of all possible actions that the actor could have chosen by their non-common features
- Comparing the distinctive outcomes to infer what non-common feature determined the intention/disposition and thus the cause for the observed behavior
EX: observer wonders why the actor chose university A over B, identifies what they do and do not have in common (non-common features: A is in a city, B has good reputation), infers the reasoning behind the intention (cause of) is that the special features in A are more important to the actor than in B
What is a correspondence bias when a person is working out the cause of a behavior, according to the correspondent inference theory where the observers infers dispositions/intentions to correspond with observed behavior?
EX: people still infer that the writer of a pro-fascist piece is pro-fascist, even when they know that the writer was told to take that stance in the piece
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding