The undertakers of Metaphysics - Context distinction
3 important questions on The undertakers of Metaphysics - Context distinction
What is the traditional reading of Reichenbach?
Context of discovery versus context of justification as temporal distinction. The distinction is unuseful: discovery processes are complex processes where there are a lot of hypotheses and their testing requires creativity. The complexity of problem solving is oversimplified
Epistemology according to Reichenbach? Why not Philosophical
It is part of sociology, because it is descriptive. POS should be normative (Vienna). Normative is 'rational reconstruction' (how it should be) of relation data. Hypothesis; Reichenbach does not preclude a 'rational reconstructism' of discovery processes.
Quine's dogmas of empiricism and his 'solution'
Dogma 1: Humes fork, analytic and synthetic statements. Dogma 2: reductionism/verificationism: the meaning of a synthetic statement is the procedure one should follow to verify/check wheteher it is true back to impressions.
But when no procedure, it is meaningless. (looking at you metaphysics)
But when no procedure, it is meaningless. (looking at you metaphysics)
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
