Summary: Archaeological Theory

Study material generic cover image
  • This + 400k other summaries
  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
PLEASE KNOW!!! There are just 97 flashcards and notes available for this material. This summary might not be complete. Please search similar or other summaries.
Use this summary
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo

Read the summary and the most important questions on Archaeological Theory

  • 1 Induction - Deduction - Abduction

    This is a preview. There are 9 more flashcards available for chapter 1
    Show more cards here

  • What is the difference between deduction and induction?

    Deduction: the conclusion is certain
    Induction: the conclusion is probable
  • What are the views of Popper?

    • You can falsify a conviction by doing one observation 
    ->  criticized for this very atomistic approach to knowledge.

    • ''Doing science is about having one proposition and one state of affairs in reality and then is it falsified or corroborated''
  • What were critiques on Popper?

    • There are many ways of reasoning around a falsification
    • Falsification is never a one-on-one thing (one proposition and one state of affairs)
      • It is a holistic thing = a body of knowledge
        • There is always a tinkering somewhere in this body of knowledge
  • With what concepts does abduction deal?

    • Equifinality
    • Underdetermination
  • 2 Archaeological observation is theory-laden

    This is a preview. There are 18 more flashcards available for chapter 2
    Show more cards here

  • What is the problem of induction?

    • There is no complete certainty that the next time the result is the same
    • The truth is hard to come by - Popper 
  • Who had the logical positivism view?

    Hume
  • Who's view is an example of a relativism view?

    Kuhn
  • What makes the many paradigms stronger? (present-day view)

    • All the paradigms come across corroboration and falsifications of their predictions and they handle this corroboration -> make them stronger
    • Falsifications can make them weaker but there is no such thing as instant reality or instant falsification
  • What is the critique on the view of Putnam?

    • Too naïve
    • Too atomistic
    • Too holistic 
  • A holistic, constructive, moderately realist, pluralist view of archaeological research (present day view?)

    • The specific paradigm not only defines the meaning of terms, but also what is considered to be:
      • A solid argument
      • A good reason to revise a view
      • Reliable empirical evidence
      • What the subject matter of the particular discipline should be in the first place
PLEASE KNOW!!! There are just 97 flashcards and notes available for this material. This summary might not be complete. Please search similar or other summaries.

To read further, please click:

Read the full summary
This summary +380.000 other summaries A unique study tool A rehearsal system for this summary Studycoaching with videos
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart