Plurality of qualitative research design - Langley & Abdallah
15 important questions on Plurality of qualitative research design - Langley & Abdallah
Why has qualitative research strengths in understanding processes?
Based on different epistemological foundations, there are four different approaches in doing and writing qualitative research distinguished in the article of Langley & Abdallah. These are related to strategy. Explain the different approaches briefly.
- Eisenhardt method; testable proposition to create new knowledge in which factual data is derived. More post-positivistic paradigm.
- Gioia template; capturing and modeling participant's meaning. Grounded theory and constructivism.
- Practice turn; strategy is something that people do. It's about the way in which knowledge is embedded in practical activities.
- Discursive turn; understand how social phenomena are constructed over time. This is more about the set of texts and of the practices related to the production.
What's the difference between the Eisenhardt and Gioia method regarding the epistemological foundation and research quality?
Regarding the research quality, the Eisenhardt method relies on validity and reliability, whereas the Gioia method relies more on transferability through member checks and insider-outsider roles. Both templates want to pursue quality through triangulation.
The most important data gathering for Eisenhardt are interviews.
The most important data gathering for Gioia are interviews and observations.
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Both Eisenhardt and Gioia rely on case studies. What's the difference between the logic of methods?
The Gioia method, in contrast, analyses one case in depth.
In the Gioia method, what are the three different ways to choose a case?
2) Extremes; case where something exceptional seems to occur.
3) Revelatory; case that offers high potential for developing insights.
How is credibility in the Eisenhardt method enhanced?
What are the two steps in the Eisenhardt analysis?
step 2: iterative process of case comparison.
What are the limitations of the Eisenhardt template?
2. Its questioned whether its real novelty.
3. It gathers factual data and wants to describe a process, and generalize it to factual laws.
What are the limitations of the Gioia template?
2. The aggregated dimensions which are included in the model are at a high level. So, the explanation might be too general.
Langley and Abdallah discuss two more recent turns as alternatives for the more established templates. Regarding the practice turn, what is the most common research design chosen?
How is data presented in the practice turn?
What is the key limitation of practice research?
The discursive turn is about how social phenomena are constructed over time. It's about understanding social reality. What are the three dimensions in the research? Also explain these
Critical; this dimension is about revealing politics and power relations.
Interdiscursive; this dimension is about the interdiscursivity, meaning the interplay of discourses over time and across multiple levels (micro-meso-macro) instead of seeing it as something static.
What is crucial in the discursive turn?
What are the two limitations of the discursive turn?
- Practical implications are hardly mentioned.
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding