Cornelissen: Imagining and rationalizing opportunities: inductive reasoning and the creation and justification of new ventures
16 important questions on Cornelissen: Imagining and rationalizing opportunities: inductive reasoning and the creation and justification of new ventures
Describe the main question of the study of Cornelissen:
Using analogies or metaphors people are verbally referring to other cases and domains of experience. They give structure, allowing entrepreneurs to make sense of puzzling or unfamiliar situations. Define metaphors and analogies: (Cornelissen)
2. Analogies: literal references to cases and observations associated with entrepreneurship, market, or industry contexts, and ventures and business in general. An analogy conjoins cases from the same category of observations. (= concrete)
Analogical and metaphorical reasoning as changing mindsets and generating new ideas. Analogies and metaphors (verbally and cognitively referring to other cases and domains of experiences) can guide thinking, can generate new insights and can create understanding and social acceptance. Explain both construct (Cornelissen).
2. Metaphors refer to figurative, and hence cross-categorical, comparisons where strategies or organizational situations are likened to cultural domain of experience outside a specific business context.
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
For my 1st exam I got a C. Then, I started looking for ways to learn better and I came across Study Smart. Since then I have scored a A+, A, A- and another A. I highly recommend it to everyone who wants to hear it. I am so happy with it!!
I was struggling to finish all my first-year subjects for 3 years. Then I discovered Study Smart, which helped me to finish all of them within 3 months.
Because of StudySmart, things are going well in many ways. Before, I always had study stress and no time for anything. Now I feel calm and confident (because of the program). I used to score a B, now I usually score an A or A+.
Hey Chris, I really want to thank you very much for developing the platform, I usually got around C for my exams, now I scored an A+, an A and a A- !!
Since using Study Smart, my average has increased significantly. I even completed a statistics course with a A+ while I'm bad at statistics. I took on extra courses this year, because of Study Smart. Thanks so much!
Ever since I started studying with StudySmart I passed all my exams !!! No more re-sits!! At first, I was happy with a pass and now I only get good grades. Many thanks!
I aced all the courses I studied with Study Smart. For law, I first scored a D, and now an A! I’m 100% sure that I’ll pass all the courses I study with Study Smart.
I always thought I studied well. My grades were fine. I could never have imagined that applying these study skills would have such a huge and direct impact on my grades, my speed and the pleasure I have in learning.
For the first time, I finally feel totally confident about the way I learn. I have the perfect overview and make great progress in terms of speed and the grades I get. Thanks, Chris!
I immediately started to enjoy learning again, and my grades soared. All of a sudden, everything went better. I highly recommend Study Smart to all students..
Being able to create my materials online made the process of studying so much smoother and quicker. I no longer have to spend a huge amount of my time on creating my summaries.
At first, my notes were a mess. Now I use Study Smart to take my notes in a perfectly structured way. It helps me to save a lot of time and do other things I enjoy.
Students that study with Study Smart get better grades. The system applies all the learning methods in such a way that both well-performing students and students who struggle perform much better.
Hi Chris, I would like to thank you very much. Last year I scored C on a course, and this year I got an A+ thanks to your method! Thank you very much!
The largest effect is that my child is more enthusiastic about school! Every parent wants their children to be happy at school, Study Smart made it happen.
In high school, I failed several exams, and that has really changed now. I actually needed this tool very much back then. Since I started studying with StudySmart, I haven't had any D's. My average score is now an A and those are results I would have never had in the past
With my old method, I passed only 3 out of 8 courses. Since I started taking my notes digitally in Study Smart, I have passed all my courses on the first try. For me, StudySmart takes away the stress of wondering if I will pass or not.
Thanks to StudySmart, I passed all my exams, and with better grades than before! On top of that, I have mastered a very good study method now, which I am confident will help me earn my degree.
Why is framing essential (Cornelissen)?
2. A crucial way of facilitating understanding of novel isntances (such as a strategic change or innovations) involves uses analogical or metaphorical frames that can create or expand categories of understanding in order to incorporate the change.
3. Analogies or metaphors also bring familiarity, aid comprehension and license certain inferences (f.e. war on terror)
> It's a way of communicating
On what does the use of analogies and metaphors depend on? (Cornelissen)
2. Activation of social pressures to demonstrate the predictability and legitimacy of a venture to stakeholders.
Cornelissen argues that creating novel ventures consists of inductive analogical and metaphorical reasoning, which generates a platform for the creation and commercialization of novel ventures and facilitates the comprehension and justification of a venture. Cornelissen argues that such inductive reasoning is shaped by two determinants, which 2?
Explain how Cornelissen sees the sensemaking approach?
Entrepreneurs are likely to rearrange words creatively in the form of analogies/metaphors of speech: this allows them to imagine future opportunities and make these understanable to others.
Which 4 contributions does Cornelissen makes with this study?
2. He develops a process theory of new venture creation that specifies two determinants: the availability and applicability of prior entrepreneurial experience. And the motivation to resolve uncertainty and to gain legitimacy for novel ventures.
3. He combines and reconceptualize the predictions of theory on entrepreneurial cognition and institutional legitimacy in his process theory.
4. The process theory he proposes provides also a methodological contribution: it can be analyze shifts and changes in how entrepreneurs inductively reason about novel ventures.
What is the focus regarding the new ventures of Cornelissen in this study?
The study of new venture creation primarily has been addresses in two related but separated bodies of literature. Explain which 2. (Cornelissen)
2. Institutional theory: located entrepreneurship within a social context and has focused on cultural and symbolic realms of meaning construction around new ventures.
Cornelissen argues that the foci and limitations of both literature traditions are complementary. Explain:
What does sensemaking implies according to Cornelissen?
Cornelissen argues that in absence of directly relevant prior experiences and observations, entrepreneurs will induce metaphors to suggest an opportunity and to construct a basic scenario for the creation and commercialization of a new venture in an unfamiliar industry. Which first proposition suits this?
Cornelissen suggests that entrepreneurs prefer to project inferences that build on a whole set of relations than can be discursively projected to or aligned with a target domain. The retailing domain was also intimately familiar to the founding entrepreneur and executives. Retailing concepts had already been an established part of their vocabulary, while speaking to each other. Which proposition suits this?
According to Cornelissen in the initial stages of a venture, the default induction of argument construction that are metaphorical will be used to describe the basic idea of the venture in the target industry. Which proposition suits this?
Cornelissen has theorized about how inductive reasoning through analogies or metaphors is central not only to how entrepreneurs envision an opportunity for a novel venture but also to the way in which they communicate about that venture so that it can be understood and made acceptable and legitimate in the eyes of key stakeholders. What is highlighted by Cornelissen?
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
