Postwar reconstruction

22 important questions on Postwar reconstruction

What are the two main approaches for statebuilding?

  1. Liberal (or Democratic) Peace approach.
  2. Institutionalisation before liberation approach.

  • Monitoring and keeping agreed peace (thin blue line).
  • Limiting and containing effects of violence.
  • Later generations: multidimensional, mulitlevel, broader mandates.
  • Increasingly overlapping with peacemaking.

    What form is described above?

Peacekeeping.

Actively mediating and supporting peace negotiations. Which concept is described here?

Peacemaking.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Overcoming cultural and structural violence. Which concept is described here?

Peacebuilding.

"A central concept for this chapter". Refers to the attempt to (re)build self-sustaining institutions of governance capable  of delivering the essential public goods required to underpin perceived legitimacy and what it is hoped will eventually become an enduring peace. What concept is described here?

Statebuilding.

Widely used during the period of decolonalization to refer mainly to the enterprise of forging national identity our of the diverse populations that made up many of the newer states so that citizenship would transcend subordinate loyalties. Which concept is described above?

Nationbuilding.

What are the positive arguments for the Liberal peace approach?

  • Western liberal democracies have avoided war among themselves.
  • Economic interdependence and trade benefits for a lack of incentive for war.
  • Democratic institutions create capacity to deal with conflict non-violently.

    --> The best foundation for peace is a liberal democracy with a market-oriented economy.

The liberal peace approach developed after the Second World War. Post-war installation of government and democratic institutions and a gradual hand-over of power. During what wars was this type used by the US?

  • Afghanistan 2001.
  • Iraq 2003.

In 1945 the political conflicts were decided on the battlefield and were emphatically over before reconstruction began. What were the differences between the post-war installation of Germany and Japan and other wars after 1945?

  • Germany and Japan did not suffer from internal conflict.
  • Germany and Japan surrendered, effectively stopping the war.
  • Little to no questioning of legitimacy of intervention of Germany and Japan.

What are the critics of the liberal peace approach?

  • Liberal peace is a form of neocolonialism.
  • Imposing Western values and institutions on non-Western societies, for western benefit.
  • Intervening powers subject and dominate the underdeveloped world.

From a "conservative" perspective Jeffrey Herbst (2003) advises against "fixing states". Why?

Because, according to Herbst when this artificially keeps unviable political entities on a life-support system that simply preserves insecurity. > It is better to let them fail.

Despite its criticism, Liberal Peace is still the most prevalent and dominant approach. What are the alternatives?

IBL approach. Institutionalisation before liberatlisation approach.

First, institutions need to be built.

IBL approach. Why do institutions need to be built?

  • To manage conflicts non-violently.
  • Benevolent dictatorship as an interim solution.
  • Promoting democracy while imposing insitutions.

Paul Bremmer was the dictator of Iraq. Part of the government after. Transferred power to the Iraq government again. Which approach was conducted by Paul Bremmer?

Insitutionalisation before liberalisation approach (IBL approach).

Dilemmas and tradeoffs. There are both short-term security priorities and long-term development priorities. Give one example of both:

  • Short term: Bombarding threats deals with enemy commanders: security vs accountability for actions (destruction).
  • Long term: Democracy and market economy (assumed) beneficial in the long run, however can be destabilising in the short-term (construction).

IRW operations. Phases and actors. Security. From military and rebel groups to -->

Demilitarised (gedemitraliseerde) politics and civilian policing. >  No longer a gang, but a police force.

IRW operations. Phases and actors. Law and order. From human rights abuses, violence and impunity to -->

Rule of law and non-politicised judiciary and police. >  Communal needs.

IRW operations. Phases and actors. Government. From conflict and "rule of the gun" to -->

Stable democracy. > Democracy would probably not work immediately. 

IRW operations. Phases and actors. Economy. From war economies and humanitarian relief to -->

Long-term development in the interest of all citizens.

IRW operations. Phases and actors. Society. From divided societies and tensions between groups to -->

Reconciliation and equality.

IRW operations. Phases and actors. International intervention transition. From peacemaking and peacebuilding to -->

Local control and integration into global structures.

What are the problems with IRW and Peacebuilding:

  •   Hard to speak of phases, because of the ongoing conflicts.
  •   Exit strategies lack prolonged support from donors.
  •   Political need to show "quick results". > Re-elected. Within your term.
  •   These political reforms take much more time and are much more complex than training, equipping, and building.
  •   Risk of Blue-print approach. Ticking boxes.

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo