Torts and Professional Liability and Expert Evidence

13 important questions on Torts and Professional Liability and Expert Evidence

What is tort law?

Area of law that protects people from other people's negligence

What elements of a case must be present in order for a situation to be actionable in tort law?

Duty of care must be owed by defendant to plaintiff, there must be a breach of that duty and a loss caused by that breach

What is negligence? How does this relate to tort law?

Omission to do something a reasonable man would do
You must take reasonable care to avoid acts that you can reasonably foresee and would be likely to injure your neighbor - if this is not done it can be the basis for a case
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

How is Tort Law applied to Commercial Transactions?

- Liability follows contractual chain: manufacturer, distributor, consumer

What did Donoghue vs Steveson change with regards to Tort Law?

Established general principles for the duty of care
- snail in the bottle case - sues manufacturer
- Changed definition of liability for personal injury

What did the Winnepeg Condominium Case change?

Extended tort liability to "pure economic loss" provided there was a danger to health and safety
- Dangerous defect in building - liability for cost of repair
- Determining if contractor is liable in tort for economic loss to subsequent purchaser

Who is "my neighbour" and what is "foreseeable"

- There must be a sufficiently close relationship between parties to justify imposition of duty
- No policy considerations

What 5 requirements came from The Queen v. Cognos case? How does this relate to professionals and tort liability?

The Queen v. Cognos case: defendant hired plaintiff to work on project, told defendant that would be a lasting position - position was cancelled
  1. Must be a duty of care based on special relationship between parties
  2. Representation must be untrue/misleading
  3. Representor must have acted negligently
  4. Representee must have relied on negligent misrepresentation
  5. Reliance must have been detrimental

What was the Surry v Carrol-Hatch case? How does it relate to Tort Law?

- Building settlement due to improper site evaluation, architect rejected deep test pits and engineer submitted their report based off improper evaluation
- Duty of care from architect and engineer
- Showed negligence on behalf of the engineer due to "failure to warn"

What did the Kuehne and Nagel case demonstrate?

Personal liability for negligence-

What is the Ultimate Limitation period?

15 years from event in question
- Limitation period for all actions is 2 years that starts after the plantiff knows the damage and the fact that they have a claim

What is the difference between the 2 year limitation period and 15 year ultimate limitation period?

15 year brings an end to everything
2 years from discovery of claim

What must be present for tort law to apply to an engineering project?

Substantial connection to health and safety

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo