Agency problems and legal strategies

18 important questions on Agency problems and legal strategies

What are the three agency problems?

1. Shareholders (owners) - managers
2. Majority shareholders - minority shareholders
3. Shareholders - other stakeholders

True or false: the greater the complexity of tasks undertaken by the agent, and the greater the discretion the agent must be given, the larger these "agency costs" are likely to be

True, more complexity, more agency problems

With which things do agency costs rise?

1. Complexity of tasks for agents
2. Number of principals (coordination costs)
- Amount of Smaller shareholders
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

True or false: high coordination costs render governance strategies less successful in controlling agents, and make regulatory strategies preferred as a legal strategy to reduce agency costs

True

How does law in general and corporate law in particular play a role in reducing agency costs?

Law makers constrain agents, the make rules to prohibit specific behaviour

What is the main distinction between regulatory strategies and governance strategies?

Regulatory strategies: dictating terms
- Prescriptive
- Dictating the content of the principal agent relationship
- Agent constraining

Governance strategies: control behaviour
- Facilitate the principal's control over their agents behaviour
- Principal empowering

Why is the decision rights strategy less prominent in CL than the appointment rights strategy?

The board has all the power to make decisions. Shareholders only have limited amount of decision oppoortunities
- Changes in the companies constitution
- Investment decisions (mergers)
- Decisions when directors are conflicted

What are the five legal strategies?

1. Agent constraints
- Rules: command no harm principals interest
- Standards: internal affairs
2. Affiliation terms
- Terms of entry: before contracting
- Terms of exit: sell stock
3. Incentive alignment
- Trusteeship strategy: remove conflicts of interest
- Reward strategy: reward for advancing interest of principal
4. Appointment rights
- Selection: who do you select on your board
- Removal: when do you fire people
5. Decision rights
- Initiation
- Veto

How can terms of entry and exit constrain agents?

Terms of entry:
- Quality of performance is gathered before contracting
- Public investors need a form of systematic disclosure to obtain information (full disclosure)

Terms of exit:
- Right to sell the stock
- Escape opportunistic agents (right to withdraw/transfer shares)

What is one well-known example of the trusteeship strategy?

Independent director: no profit from decision nor will they try to control the shareholders, more drawn by reputation and conscience
- Guardians to the firm

Explain why incentivising managers by compensating them in the form of shares is an example of both the "sharing rule" and the pay-for-performance rule

Sharing rule: ties the agents monetary returns directly to the principals

Pay-for-performance rule: agent is paid in successfully advancing the principals interest

- Shares are both; managers will have their own interest in making sure the company runs well, so they will match the expectations of the original shareholders

Why would a lot of minority shareholders have increased agency costs?

It costs them more to obtain information than for majority shareholders. Plus there are more coordination costs, since there are a lot more small investors, so more collaboration is needed (which is costly)

What would be the reason for directors having fiduciary (parenting) duties towards the company and not towards shareholders?

If directors would have fiduciary duties towards shareholders, shareholders would be much more active and this would have an effect on the investor diversity of their capital.

What is the main difference between the Anglo American model and the Stakeholders model?

Anglo-American: common law
- Shareholder value norms
-One tier board
- Low ownership concentration

Stakeholders model - civil law
- Stakeholder concerns
- Two tier board
- Focus on insider ownership

What are three modalities of enforcement?

1. Public enforcement - criminal and civil suits
2. Private enforcement - class actions
3. Gatekeeper control - Accountants and lawyers

Why can public enforcement be seen as suffering from weaker incentives than private enforcement?

Public enforcers have weaker incentives, since they do not obtain any financial payments

A solution would be for public enforcers to retain some earnings

What is an example of private enforcement by a public actor?

When the government is a shareholder (airports)

In some civil law jurisdictions, ex ante consequences of violating company law rules is an annulent of corporate decisions. How can this reduce agency costs?

Ex ante: the costs of cancelling and delaying until the action has been regularized, can be substantial. If the actions have no legal effect at all, these costs are avoided.

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo