Groups as imperfection decision makers - Aramovich, Lytle & Skitka (2012). Opposing torture: Moral conviction and resistance to majority influence
5 important questions on Groups as imperfection decision makers - Aramovich, Lytle & Skitka (2012). Opposing torture: Moral conviction and resistance to majority influence
Why this research? Aramovich, Lytle & Skitka (2012).
What is the research question? Aramovich, Lytle & Skitka (2012).
What is their hypothesis? Aramovich, Lytle & Skitka (2012).
for people with strong moral convictions , need for acceptance and need to be correct should be relatively weak. Moral convictions work as a fact. If you are not acted to your believes you are feeling guilty. you are not pleased with yourselves.
they also predicted that social support is a key factor in reducing conformity.
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
What was the experiment? Aramovich, Lytle & Skitka (2012).
procedure: participants had to give their opinion (online) about torture, after fictious group members had given their opinion first. They gave their opinion three times.
prime dependent measure: change in relative support or opposition to torture.
prime predictor (independent variable): strenght of moral conviction.
They included three indices of attitude strenght as controlvariables: attitude certainly, attitude importance, religious convictions
What were the results? Aramovich, Lytle & Skitka (2012).
participants were influenced by majority opinion even after group attraction.
moral conviction predicted resistance to majority influence and conformity, both in public and private.
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
![Trustpilot Logo](/images/design_2020/lp/clp-trustpilot-en.png)