Summary: Designing Effective Organizations : How To Create Structured Networks | 9780787960643 | Michael Goold, et al
- This + 400k other summaries
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Read the summary and the most important questions on Designing effective organizations : how to create structured networks | 9780787960643 | Michael Goold; Andrew Campbell.
-
1 Structured Networks
This is a preview. There are 2 more flashcards available for chapter 1
Show more cards here -
What is according to G&C a 'structured network'?
An organization with the maximum of self-management, but with sufficient structure and hierarchy to work well. -
To develop a structured network, G&C have an approach to corporate organization design. Which 3 components does this approach includes?
1 Nine tests of good design: to highlight the weaknesses of, and refines the design2 A taxonomy thats help to describe and discuss different design options with more clarity. And to develop alternatives.3 A process that can be followed when managers are facing a design challenge. This helps them to achieve the structured network. -
1.1 Nine design tests
This is a preview. There are 2 more flashcards available for chapter 1.1
Show more cards here -
On which basics is G&C's framework grounded?
1 The fit concept, with 4 drivers of fit: product-market strategies, corporate strategies, people and constraints2 5 good design principles, for optimal org. design: specialization, co-ordination, knowledge and competence, control and commitment, and innovation and adaptation principle. -
1.1.1 The fit test
This is a preview. There are 1 more flashcards available for chapter 1.1.1
Show more cards here -
The 4 fit drivers (product-market strategie, corporate strategie, people, constraints) lead to 4 fit tests, which 4?
1 The market-advantage test: does the design allocate sufficient management attention to the operating priorities and intended sources of advantage in each product-market area?2 The parenting advantage test: does the design allocate sufficient attention to the intended sources of added value and strategic initiatives of the corporate parent?3 The people test: Does the design adequately reflect the motivations, strengths, and weaknesses of the available people?4 The feasibility test: does the design take account of the constraints that may make the proposal unworkable? -
1.1.2 The good design tests
This is a preview. There are 3 more flashcards available for chapter 1.1.2
Show more cards here -
The knowledge and competence principle is concerned with delegation: responsibilities should be allocated to the person/team best placed to assemble the knowledge/competence. Which practical tests follows from this principle?
The redundant hierarchy test: are all levels in the hierarchy and all responsibilities retained by higher levels based on a knowledge and competence advantage? -
The control and commitment principle concerns 2 challenges: how to maintain appropriate control and how to insure high levels of motivation? Units should feel strong pressured to self-correct, and parent-level management should be able to identify problems easily. To which test does this leads?
The accountability test: does the design facilitate the creation of a control process for each unit that is appropriate to the unit's responsibilities, economical to implement, and motivating for the managers in the unit?
>> Helps managers to design units and establish performance measures that produce effective, low-cost controls that are highly motivating. -
The innovation and adaptation principle states that structures should be designed to innovate and adapt as uncertainities become clarified and environments change. It has to cope with the conditions of tomorrow. Which leads to the test:
The flexibility test: will the design help to the development of new strategies and be flexible enough to adapt to future changes? -
1.1.3 Using the tests
This is a preview. There are 1 more flashcards available for chapter 1.1.3
Show more cards here -
What are the reasons for using the tests?
-Test which advantages the different designs have-Clarifie the issues of an organization-Pointing out Trade offs and weak points in a design-Way pros/cons and provide a rigorous analytical structure for making design choices -
1.3 The design process
This is a preview. There are 1 more flashcards available for chapter 1.3
Show more cards here -
Which 3 essential steps need to be addressed in the design process of G&C?
1 One or more proposed designs or design concepts need to be developed2 The preferred option(s) need to be tested and refined3 The chosen design then needs to be finalized to aid communication and implementation -
1.3.3 Communicating the design
-
Once a design option has been tested, refined and chosen, the design process is alsmost complete. But the following step is ' communication', describe this step:
Are the role definitions, policies, processes, and mechanisms described in a way that will allow unit managers to start work without further guidance? The previous steps were 'just enough'. This stept helps managers to understand what is intented.
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Topics related to Summary: Designing Effective Organizations : How To Create Structured Networks
-
Structured Networks - A new approach to organization design
-
The fit drivers and tests - The concept of fit
-
The good design principles and tests - Specialization, co-ordination, and unit boundaries
-
The good design principles and tests - The knowledge and competence principle
-
The good design principles and tests - The control and commitment principle
-
The good design principles and tests - The innovation and adaptation principle
-
Simple and complex structures - SBU-based structures
-
Simple and complex structures - Management challenges for SBU-based structures
-
Simple and complex structures - Interdependent structures
-
Simple and complex structures - Management challenges for interdependent structures
-
Simple and complex structures - Complexity and clarity
-
A taxonomy of unit roles - What to specify
-
Parenting in complex structures - Parenting challenges in interdependent structures
-
Parenting in complex structures - Parent functioning
-
Parenting in complex structures - Parenting levels and reporting relationships
-
Bacharach - Organizational theories: some criteria for evaluation
-
Barney - Film resources and sustained competitive advantage (VRIN)
-
Priem & Butler - Is the RBV a useful perspective for strategic management research?
-
Sirmon, Hitt & Ireland - Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the blackbox
-
Entrepreneurial articles - Burgelman: designs for corporate entrepreneurship
-
Entrepreneurial articles - Chesbrough: designing corporate ventures in the shadow of private venture capital
-
Entrepreneurial articles - Hayton & Kelley: A competency-based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship
-
Entrepreneurial articles - Hornsby et al. Managers corporate entrepreneurial actions: examining perception and position
-
Entrepreneurial articles - Keil et al. Gems from the ashes: capability creation and transformation in internal corporate venturing
-
Entrepreneurial articles - Brettel et al.: Corporate effectuation: entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance
-
Entrepreneurial articles - Wiltbank et al.: What to do next? The case for non-predictive strategy
-
Alliances articles - Reuer/Klijn/Lioukas: Board Involvement in International Joint Ventures
-
Alliances articles - Hoffmann: How to manage a portfolio of Alliances
-
Alliances articles - Kale&Singh: Building firm capabilities through learning: the role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success
-
Alliances articles - Oxley&Sampson: The scope and governance of international R&D alliances
-
Alliances articles - Wang&Zajac: Allianc or acquisition? A dyadic perspective on interfirm resource combinations