Anthias - Moving beyond the Janus face of integration and diversity discourses: towards an intersectional framing

11 important questions on Anthias - Moving beyond the Janus face of integration and diversity discourses: towards an intersectional framing

What does this article argue/propose?

It argues that both integration and diversity in the current period involve boundary-making and hierarchy-making processes. There is a need to move beyond the janus-faced character since they purpotedly aim to attack social divisions, they are underpinned by binary and essentialized constructions of these very divisions.

What are the two entities that are lurking at the centre of integration and diversity?

Society and culture: this thinks that this is a static unit of culture with fixed boundaries.

How do we need to understand patterns of group-making and their practices?

Not as given and unchanging: cultural struggles can also be a means of solidarity with the migrant group, like with mother tongue classes and complementary ethnic schools
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Which two aspects are trying to be balances in the current discussions on diversity?

The maintenance of 'good difference' and the pursuit of a harmonious society with core values: "how much difference and of what kind is compatible with a cohesive society?" and "how much diversity can a society tolerate before it is in danger of disintegrating?"

What does Anthias argue about how we should use the term diversity?

Not referring to the other: it is not something between us, bus also within us.

What is the difference between structural and cultural assimilation?

Structuur assimilation is often in the public space of integration; labour market or education

What are central discourses involved with the programmatics of an integration agenda?

The trope about migrants' unwillingness to integrate to be corrected, by requiring them to demonstrate their willingness for a citizenship test. The second trope is the impossibility of some bad difference being eliminated and being a threat to Western values and society

What are two themes in political discourse that Cesari (2009) identifies?

The distinction between bad islam and the law abiding good islam and a tendency to use Moslims as a spokesperson to criticize Islam

What are examples of the "bad Muslims" in the media?

Honour-based violence, forced marriages, body covering of women

What does Anthias mean with social divisions being irreducible and dialogical?

They cannot be explained through a process of reduction to other categories (race cannot be understood in terms of class)
In the context of each other, they produce fissures and amplifications of inequality

What is the view of Anthias regarding interculturalism?

It is best considered in terms of a particular formulation of an intersectional and cosmopolitan imaginary which could be referred to as translocational

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo