And 06 Does parties matter?

7 important questions on And 06 Does parties matter?

What is Raunio and Wagner arguing about the effect of party systems?

There are genuine ideological differences between parties, and this also has an effect on foreign policy preferences.

They review other literature.

What does Drezner say about populist leaders?

Does populists have effect in the institutions and on policies? Populists will more likley escalate international conflicts and subverd international order.

What does Milner and Judkins find about parties and trade policy?

Trade policy; are there a left right divide between parties?
Does the ideology and the voters to the party matter?
They look at the cleavage division: different parties have difierent voters with different intersts, and so will the party.
  • Left: labours - mroe protectionistic
  • Right: business and trade  - free trade in focus
They find support for this hypothesis that partisanship matters.
They also find that globalisation matters: if you have a country wiht higher integration into the world economy, all parties will be more for free trade.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What is the GAL-TAN dimension? And what is it used for?

GAL-TAN:
  • Tan: the traditional authoritarian
  • Gal: green alternative left

    Hooghe et al. Argues that:  On traditional topics like trade we can use the left/right scale, but when we look at new topics like climate and integration, then the GAL/TAN scale is more useful.

What does Finke argue about the government's stance on EU integration?

What determines government positions on eu integration reforms?
He finds that the median voter will affect the governemnt's position, e.g. Through the parliament's position on eu integration.

What does Kaarbo argue about junior parties in government?

He explains why some junior parties have more power than their size would indicate.
He says that they have more power when:
  • By holding a ministerial position, especially if it is a ministry with a lot of power: the information asymmetry means that you can get your way.
  • If they have a strategy to threaten the sitting power: if they can remove the government.
    • Example: DF kept threatening not to accept the budget if they did not get their way on immigration.
  • If you are unanimous in your position you can mobilize more resources and thus gain more influence.

What does Potrafke argue about American presidents? And why can it be critizised?

Potrafke argues (and finds) that leftist government will align less with an American republican president than a Democratic one.

Critiques:
  • Uses UNGA voting (1984-2005)
  • Looks at fiscal policy, but UNGA does not have much to do with that.  

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo