Methodologies of positive economics - Milton Friedman

10 important questions on Methodologies of positive economics - Milton Friedman

What was Milton Friedman's methodology of positive economics?

Friedman found that simple, naive models predict much better than the difficult models of Tinbergen. (Simplifying like Marshall)

Instead of making an analysis with a correct model for an entire economy, it is better to start small. (Like locally)
- Build a model and check it, then slowly expand it by adding other areas.
- Anti-realisticness: The assumptions need not to be realistic, as long as they provide good predictions. (The more significant a model is, the less realistic the assumptions are)

What are the three kinds of assumptions according to Alan Musgrave that an instrumentalist position stems from?

1. A negligibility assumption: a factor that can be expected to influence the phenonomenos under investigation has no discernible effect.

2. A domain assumption: an expected factor is absent, and is therefore used to specify the domain of applicability of the theory concerned.

3. A heuristic assumption: a factor is considered negligible, to simplify the logical development of the theory.

What are the two options to deal with the problem of specification of domain? By Friedman

1. To use a more comprehensive theory (the Cowles Comission approach): add more factors

2. To select the phenomena for which the theory works (domain), does the law of falling bodies work outside the vaccum
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What was Cowles Commission's view on the incompleteness problem?

To understand a particular aspect of economic behaviour, we need a complete system of descriptive equations. These equations should contain all relevant variables.
The solution is to construct an increasingly more comprehensive model

How was it tested what the solution of incompleteness was? Tested by Christ

There were three models between 3 and 15 equations. (Tested by Christ)

Two naive models:
1. Next years value will be equal to this years value + a normal disturbance with mean zero and a constant variance

2. Next years value will be equal this years value + the change in this years value + a disturbance.

2/3 times more accurate predictions, but can only predict if there is an effect, not the actual effect

What was Friedman's critique?

The validity of equations should be determinded by high correlation between coefficients.

Friedman saw the simple models as null hypotheses (standards of comparisons)

What was the Marshallian approach? (Adopted by Friedman)

The more narrow a theory, the less in correlates to real life
The more significant a theory is, the less realistic the assumptions are

How should a model be evaluated according to Friedman?

A model should be evaluated by its abilty to predict rather than its realisticnes.

However: this is not realistic, since economists are always dependent on circumstances (passive observations)

How does Friedman give critique on the standard view of laws?

Standard view: must contain no essential reference to particular sytems/objects.

Friedman argues: the specification of a domain must be given with the generalization for which this applies. 

What parts should a hypothesis consist of according to Friedman?

1. A model contains only assumptions that are important (neglegibiltiy assumptions)

2. Domain specifications

3. Specifications of correspondence between the variables in the model and the observable  phenomena

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo