Thinking computers

18 important questions on Thinking computers

How does functionalism follow logically from non-reductive materialism?

  • Due to multiple realization of mental states it is not so useful to look at how mental states are realized.
  • therefor it should be focused on what the functions of certain mental states are.

Describe the thought experiment of the silicone brain or fading qualia thought experiment

  • One day you wake up and don't see very well anymore so you go to the doctor.
  • doctor concludes it is something wrong in your brain which can be solved by a silicon chip that will fulfill the functions of the damaged neurons
  • next thing you don't hear very well and the same thing occurs
  • until your whole brain is made out of silicone, do you still have consciousness?

How did john searle wipe out the hype around a thinking computer?

  • Proposes the thought experiment of the chinese room
  • you are in a room where chinese notes are passed under the door.
  • you have a book that tells you what to respond to which note
  • you have a full conversation in chinese, the people outside the room think you speak chinese while you know you can't
  • the analogy is that you are the turing machine, designed to know what to respond to what input without knowing what the responses mean.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What is the reasoning behind searle's thought experiment

  • The computer in the turing tests just gives responses to the input it gets
  • but it doesn't attach meaning to these responses
  • when we talk about concepts we attach concepts of the outside worlds to the words we use, a computer doesn't do this
  • this is essential for consciousness and this is why a computer doesn't have consciousness

What were the responses to searle's chinese room, and how did he respond to that?

  • Response was that one turing machine/chinese room might not be enough, what if we made a whole network where each unit would be like a neuron
  • answer was A network of Chinese rooms/turing machines doesn't understand anything either it would just be a more complex input output mechanism
  • Simulating is not the same as realizing, meaning is essential for consciousness.

What are two things that are hard to explain for materialism?

  • Subjectiveness of experience; qualia
  • free will

How is illustrated that a materialist explanation of experiences misses out on subjectiveness of experience?

  • The thought experiment of mary the colourscientist illustrates a girl that grows up in a room that is black and white
  • in this room she studies everything there is to know about colour
  • what kind of wavelength, how to distinguish, etc. All in a materialistic way
  • once she knows everything she goes outside and sees the colours for the first time, does she learn something new.
  • materialistic descriptions of information miss out on what it's actually like to experience something

According to nagel what is consciousness?

What it is like for something to be that something

What is the hard problem of consciousness?

  • how is subjective experience possible at all?
  • How and why do physical properties lead to subjective experiences?

What are the views of david chalmers on the hard problem of consciousness?

  • He argues that standard research only deals with the "easy problem".
  • One only investigates which brain processes are at the basis of which experiences
  • But the real mystery, the problem of consciousness - why do we have qualia at all - is not addressed
  • he states that we should maybe inflate physics to include the mind since we cannot explain it based on what physics already contains

What is the cognitive closure hypothesis

  • That we are unable to ever understand the hard problem of consciousness due to physical limits
  • A dog can't learn the Pythagorean theorem either

Describe psychology's view on free will

  • Starting point: we see that organisms, such as humans, operate autonomously (according to individual laws)
  • In other words, our behavior seems to come "from ourselves"
  • We are used to holding people responsible for their behavior
  • behavior comes from the person within

What are the criteria for free will?

  • The intention of behavior precedes behavior
  • The behavior wasn't necessary (you could have done something else)
  • The intention of behavior was the cause of the behavior

How do we call the intuition that The physical state of the world at t fully determines the physical state at t+1?

Determinism

What are the options to explain free will into determinism, since determinism leaves not so much room for free will?

  • Refute determinism
  • determinism is consistent with free will

How does refuting determinism give room for free will?

  • By refuting determinism you assume probabilism
  • this means that behavior is not completely determined by the behavior before but behavior has a certain probability to happen which can be increased or decreased.
  • this actually doesn't give room for free will at all because in that case if you have the intention to produce behavior there's also a chance that it doesn't happen.
  • this means that you are a slave to the probability
  • you actually need a form of determinism; namely between the intention and the behavior; if the intention is there then it must be the case the behavior follows.

How did libet contribute to the problem of free will?

  • He did a research where he put people in a situation where they saw a clock and a button
  • there task was to press the button and remember the time they had the intention to press the button.
  • he showed through eeg that the action potential to push the button was already there before people had the intention to push the button.
  • the results are replicated in other studies

One way to save free will is to conceptualize it differently, how would we do that?

  • Free will is often considered an explanatory entity (something that explains)
  • But you can also see free will as a phenomenon to be explained;
  • we clearly differ in autonomy from cars and stones, Call this phenomenon "free will"
  • the question then would be how this difference arises.

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo