Non-discrimination

9 important questions on Non-discrimination

Legal framework EU

  • Art. 21 CFR
  • secundary EU-law: equal treatment directives
    • Directive 200/43 (race) - CJEU CHEZ
    • Directive 200/78 (religion, disabilities, age, sexual orientation) - CJEU Achbita
    • Directive 2006/54 (gender)

Scope EU non-discrimination law

Non-discrimination law in the EU protects certain groups of people and thus it excludes some groups that aren't in the directives

It is a 'closed system'
  • exception direct discrimination 
    • however, this is not an absolute right
    • directives specify when direct discrimination is allowed.   

Directive 200/78 (religion, disability, age, sexual orientation) + difference ECHR

CJEU G4S (achbita) -> direct/indirect discrimination

Difference ECHR
  • before the ECHR you can only brig cases against a state, so this would not be able to happen before the ECtHR
    • directives also apply to horizontal relationships between citizens.   
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Compliance with article 14 ECHR

  • Was the applicant treated differently from persons in analogous situations?
  • was the difference in treatment objectively and reasonably justified?

Art. 14 ECHR; accessory character

ECtHR Kiyutin v. Russia §54
Article 14 needs to be combined with another article otherwise it is not applicable.

Prohibited grounds (ECHR)

Art. 14 ECHR, however this is not an exhaustive list but rather illustratory. There is no limited material scope.
see: ECtHR Kiyutin v. Russia §56

Justification of the prohibited ground (ECHR )

ECtHR Kiyutin v. Russia §62
  1. is there a legitimate aim?
  2. reasonable relationship of proportionality between the aim and the means employed
    1. no specific justification grounds

states enjoy a margin of appreciation in assessing the justification of difference in treatment.
  • However, this margin is narrower and it has to have VWR for the restrictions, if it is about a group in society -> §63
  • However, European consensus can also play a role in te consideration of the court -> §65

Very weighty reasons (VWR-test) ECHR

  1. Suspected ground of discrimination
    1. more serious grounds (see table)
  2. narrow margin of appreciation
  3. state needs to prove there are VWR
  4. hardly any possibility for justifications
    1. because: you cannot help it (gender, skin, etc.) 

ECHR burden of proof

Applicant must give evidence of discrimination
State must proof justification

exception -> ECtHR D.H v. Czech Republic
  • indirect discrimination
  • evidence shown by applicant shows a rebuttable presumption   
  • burden of proof shifts to government to prove there has been made no discrimination
  • + government needs to show justification

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo