Thurik: entreprenomics, entrepreneurship, economic growth & policy

13 important questions on Thurik: entreprenomics, entrepreneurship, economic growth & policy

There are six channels of policy intervention

  1. Demand side of entrepreneurship
  2. supply side of entrepreneurship
  3. influence abilities and resources of potential entrepreneurs
  4. works through preferences of individuals to become entrepreneur
  5. directed at decision making of individuals
  6. accesibility of markets

14 dimensions of differences between ME and EE (comes back in other article), seperated in 4 groups:

  • underlying forces: localization vs globalization, change vs. continuity, jobs with high wages vs. jobs or high wages
  • External environment: turbulence vs. stability, diversity vs. specialization, heterogeneity vs. homogeneity
  • how firms function: motivation vs. control, market exchange vs. firm transaction, competition with cooperation vs, competition or cooperation, flexibility vs. scale
  • Government policy: enabling vs. constraining, input targeting vs. output, national locus vs. local locus, entrepreneurs vs. incumbents

Two Schumpeterian regimes had two broad concepts of economics:

  • Managed economy: flourished for most of last century. Based on relative certain ouputs, which consisted mainly of manufactured products and were brought forward by traditional inputs: labour, capital and land
  • Entrepreneurial economy: based on elements like flexibility, turbulence, diversity, creativity and novelty.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Schumpeter Mark II regime focuses on

  • Innovative activities by LE
  • LE outperforms SE in innovation through a strong positive feedback loop from innovation

Since last decade of 20th century, changed role for SE

  • More and more seen as vehicle for entrepreneurship
  • contributes not just to employment, and social/political stabilty, but to innovative and competitive power
  • Entrepreneurship and SE seen as drivers of growth

Technology developments and demand shifts, give resource availability, and thus generate new business opportunities. These can be exploited by

  • Existing firms
  • creation of new ventures by entrepreneurs
  • LE, reffered as corporate entrepreneurship or intrapreneurship

Three levels of analysis are distinguished when explaining entrepreneurship

  • Micro: decission process of individu, and their motives of becoming self-employed.
  • Industry: market specific determinants of entrepreneurship, as profit opportunities
  • Macro: range of environmental factors, as technological, economic and cultural variables

Three ways in which entrepreneurial capital affects economic growth

  • Creating knowledge spillovers: knowledge worker may exit firm in order to create new company, knowledge spills over to new firm in which its commercialized.
  • Number of enterprises and increasing competition: enhance competition of new ideas, and facilitates specializing in particular niche
  • Providing diversity among firms: greater number of firms, and greater variety in firms and geographic

Emergence of entrepreneurial economy

  • Fundamental changes in world economy in 70s
  • Led to global competition, increase in uncertainty and market fragmentation
  • Computer caused flexible automation, which effected shift from LE to SE
  • Shift towards knowledge based economy is the driving force behind shift from LE to SE

Schumpeter Mark I regime's main characteristic was process of creative destruction

  • innovation entrepreneur challenges incumbent firms by introducing new inventions
  • this make current technologies and products obsolete and thus driving them out of market

Five distinct stages, of evolution of Europa toward EE

  1. Denial: 80s and early 90s. Europe was facing competitive threat of LE from US, not nameless SE
  2. Recognition: mid 90s. held to traditional ideas, while embracing theory of comparative advantage and challenging resources
  3. Envy: second half 90s. Europe stagnated, and EE in US generated jobs and higher wages, become object of envy
  4. Consensus: last years 90s. New EE was superior to old ME, had to be forged in creating a new EE
  5. Attainment: signs that EE is finally emerging in Europe, consider Green Paper

Three entrepreneurial roles

  • Role of innovator: Schumpeter had most attention to innovative entrepreneur, who carries out new combinations to what we call enterprises
  • Role of perceiving profit opportunities: labeled Kirznerian entrepreneurship
  • Role of assuming risk associated with uncertainty: Knightian or neoclassical entrepreneurship

Green Paper on Entrepreneurship of European Commission

First EU document, in 2003, with entrepreneurship as most important driver of economy

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo