IR & Theories (I)

7 important questions on IR & Theories (I)

Strategic realism (Schelling)

- Focus on foreign-policy decision-making
- Views diplomacy and foreign policy as a rational instrumental activity that can be more deeply understood by the application of a form of logical analysis called Fame theory
- Presupposes values and carries normative implications
- Unlike classical realism, does not examine the values or explore them

Neo-realism (Kenneth Waltz)

- Independent states exist and operate in a system of international anarchy
- Moves away from classical realism by ignoring human nature and ethics
- International change occurs when great powers rise and fall and the balance of power shifts accordingly
- A balance of power between states can be achieved, but war is always a possibility in an anarchical system
- Waltz wants to present a scientific explanation of international politics
- However, he cannot avoid implying normative concerns and he cannot escape from making implicitly normative assumptions

Offensive realism (Mearsheimer)

1. Rests on the assumption that great powers are always searching for opportunities to gain power over their rivals with hegemony as their final goal
2. Mearsheimer refers to the realism of Waltz as 'defensive'. According to Mearsheimer, all states want to become regional hegemons.
3. He was criticised because his theory fails to explain cooperation and the existence of the EU. Also because it fails to look at historical experiences that are contrary to the thesis
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Important aspects of system theories

1. States are part of an international system and cannot be defined independent from their position as constituent part of a greater whole. States and their behaviour are molded and to be explained from their position within the wider perspective of the world system.
2. The world has a unique character. The world system is characterised by a series of unique processes.
3. Emphasis is put on the emergence and development of the system itself.

Agreement of scholars on 2 aspects on the balance of power

1. The balance of power is understood as an international relationship that is so likely to occur, and is so widely occurring, that it appears to be virtually a natural phenomenon

2. The balance of power assumes equilibrium of power among small number of major states, where power is defined narrowly in terms of military capability

Difference between realism and neorealism

- Neorealism is less philosophical, normative, and more scientific (because of behaviourism)
- In neorealism and realism, states are the most important actors in the international system
- Neo-realism is by definition a state centric approach to IR --> focus on states because states have a monopoly on formal violence
- Neo-realism looks at states as if they are black boxes (realism does not assume this)

Black Box theory

states that the actions of political parties, lobbyists, and other government players such as legislators and state governors is most effectively studied by looking at the "inputs" and "outputs" of the political system.
- Inputs are the pressures put on the system and on politicians
- Outputs are the results (new laws, changes in policies, or the changing behaviour of legislators)

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo