Summary: International Strategic Alliance
- This + 400k other summaries
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Read the summary and the most important questions on International Strategic Alliance
-
Introduction to the theme
This is a preview. There are 19 more flashcards available for chapter 09/12/2016
Show more cards here -
Is there a third option beyond make (in a firm) or buy (at the market)?
Yes, there is a third category, called the 'hybrids'. These consist of (1) strategic alliances, (2) networks, (3) outsourcing and (4) sub-contracting -
What are the various motivations of firms to enter strategic alliances?
(a) economies of scale, (b) entering new markets/faster entry in foreign markets, (C) acquisition of new skills, (d) circumvent foreign market barriers, (e) setting new standards for technology, (e) gaining competitive advantages, (f) dividing risks/sharing resources, (g) overcoming competition in a market and (h) setting new standard for technology. -
What alliances and where do there mode of governance fit?
Alliancesare a hybrid modeofgovernancebetweenmarketsandhierarchies -
What is the definition of a strategic alliance?
“Strategic alliances are links formed between two – or more – independent companies which choose to carry out a project or specific activity jointly by coordinating the necessary skills and resources rather than:
•pursuing the project or activity on their own, taking on all the risks and confronting competition alone
•merging their operations or acquiring and divesting entire business units.” -
Strategic alliances seem to fail a lot, why are they so hard to manage?
- Multiple decision-making centers
- No direct governance (outside firm's boundaries)
- Constant bargaining
- Clash of interests
- Competition to gain a 'bigger share of the pie'
- Races to learn -
Explain the Market-based view to create a sustained competitive advantage
Market-basedview (Porter): Structure–Conduct–Performance–Paradigm
Proposition: resources in an industryarehomogenousand mobile
Strategic management: selectingattractivesectorsandproducts
› Competitiveadvantageslie in favorable marketstructures: Gainingmarket power becomeskey
› Genericcompetitivestrategies: Costleadership vs. differentiation -
Explain the Resource-based view (RBV) to gain a sustained competitive advantage
Resource-basedview (Barney): Resources–Conduct–Performance–Paradigm
Proposition: resources in an industryareheterogeneousand immobile
Strategic management: creatinguniquecorecompetences
•Firm-internal resources are the sources of competitive advantage.
•Resource (bundles) need to be identified that are valuable, rare, inimitable, non-substitutable (VRIN).
•Unique resources improve organizational performance.
•Firms need to focus on their core competences and protect and develop these. -
When are resources strategic?
›Strategic resourcesare a sourceofsustainedcompetitiveadvantageiftheyare:
•valuable, i.e. create added value for customers
•rare, i.e. cannot easily be developed
•inimitable, i.e. controlled by only one firm because of unique history, social complexity, causal ambiguity
•non-substitutable, i.e. not easily substituted by competitors
All four criteria need to be fulfilled! -
Explain the Relational view (RV) to gain a sustained competitive advantage
Competitiveadvantagecanresultfromuniquerelationshipsbetweenorganizations. Sourcesof relational rentscanbe- Relation-specific assets
- Knowledge sharing routines
- Complementary resources and capabilities
- Effective governance
- Relation-specific assets
-
Which barriers can help relational rents to be prevented from imitation?
- Causal ambiguity
- Time compression diseconomies*
- Interorganizational asset stock interconnectedness
- Partner scarcity
- Resource indivisibility
- Institutional environment
- Causal ambiguity
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding