Vertical alliances and Global Supply Chains

20 important questions on Vertical alliances and Global Supply Chains





How do non-capital resources determine bargaining power and stimulate the learning race in IJV?





  • ›  Each partner contributes critical knowledge resources that form the basis for its bargaining power:
    • Local partner: Understanding of the local market, cultural and environmental conditions (e.g., investment regulations, supplier practices, labor law).
    • MNE: Technological knowledge, management systems, manufacturing skills
  • ›  Outcome of the learning race will determine each partner’s bargaining power and the instability of the IJV

Why are firms expected to benefit more from relational learning than suppliers?




  • ›  Buyers and supplier face different levels of uncertainty with respect to market demands and buyers are more exposed to demand volatility.
  • ›  The critical production and inventory-related knowledge stock of the
    supplier has relatively greater benefits for buyers than demand side information has for suppliers.

What do enhanced buyer-supplier relationships lead to?

*Supplier integration in automobile development


*Suppliers are often co-locating their production facilities to deliver JIT and sometimes JIS.
JIT and JIS reduce inventory costs but, however, create high interdependencies between buyer and supplier
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What are some sourcing practices that can lead to vertical alliances?





Ø Repeated contracting often without supplier competition
Ø Small number of direct suppliers
Ø Single and dual sourcing
Ø Early integration of suppliers in product development process Ø Price is not dominant selection criteria
Ø High degree of supplier assistance
Ø Vertical and horizontal knowledge exchange

What is the “dark side” of buyer- supplier relationships?





  • ›  Relational inertia
  • ›  Cost inefficiencies
  • ›  Lack of innovation
  • ›  Dependencies and increased risks of supply chain disruptions
  • ›  ....
    Thus managing the tension between cooperation and competition becomes key!





Why is there ‘vertical coopetition’?





  • ›  Suppliers engage in upgrading and move downstream
    (e.g. Magna Steyr builds Mercedes G-Class, the redesigned BMW 5 Series, BMW Z5, Toyota Supra and Jaguar Land Rover)
  • ›  Carmakers compete with suppliers over profit margins
  • ›  Competition between suppliers affects collaboration in the buyer-supplier dyad

Read the slides (week 4) about Toyota's supplier network!

CAREFULLY!

What is the authors’ critique on the way the issue of inter-organizational learning
is treated on the strategic alliances literature?  Grant & Baden-Fuller (2004)

ALSO::   ·The emphasis on learning, which is the acquisition of knowledge, fails to recognize the central attribute of a strategic alliance as an organizational mode that can reconcile the benefits of knowledge specialization with those of flexible integration.
·The paper counters the widespread presumption that the primary motive is knowledge acquisition through organizational learning.

What does the analogy of Pavarotti’s collaboration with the Spice Girls teach us
about learning in alliances?  Grant & Baden-Fuller (2004)

·The collaboration was for the purpose of combining different styles and capabilities of music. Not about Pavarotti learning to be like the Spice Girls or the other way around. à Knowledge accessing rather than knowledge acquiring (combined strength)

Please explain how knowledge is subject to economies of scale and scope.  Grant & Baden-Fuller (2004)

·The replication of knowledge is less costly than generating knowledge; therefore knowledge is subject to economies of scale (Same input/effort à more output). à costs of replicating knowledge are lower than creating the knowledge
·As knowledge is not specific to the production of a single product, economies of scale imply economies of scope (Differentiation). à More products possible (the higher the scope, the less the knowledge fits to a specific product.)

Why is the concentration of strategic alliances in the pharmaceutical industry
higher than the wood industry?  Grant & Baden-Fuller (2004)

 Pharma: These are sectors where knowledge requirements tend to be broad, and where much of the knowledge tends not to be product specific, hence giving rise to economies
of scope.

 Wood: In these sectors knowledge requirements are narrower and the knowledge
deployed tends to be comparatively product specific, only one raw material

What is an (international) equity-based JVs and why is it considered hierarchical?

An equity-based JV is an alliance that combines resources from more than one organization tocreate a new organizational entity (the "child"), which is distinct from its parents. Equity-basedJVs are considered hierarchical because they more closely replicate some of the featuresassociated with organizational hierarchies than do other alliances (Gulati, 1995).

Features: Control (equity-based = high control because of involved resources), administration,decision-making within each firm

Why is it more difficult for the local partner to acquire its partner’s knowledge
than the other way around?  Inkpen and Beamish (1997)

ALSO:  ·Foreign knowledge classified as skills: Skills like a complex engineering process are highly embedded in organizational routines and therefore difficult to extract from another firm. àoften tacit knowledge.
·Local knowledge classified as cognitive knowledge: Easier to transfer as skills, because it is not as sensitive to team embeddedness. The experience of the managers in an IJV is the key to acquiring this type of knowledge.

In which cases might the foreign partner decide not to acquire local knowledge?  Inkpen and Beamish (1997)

 A partner's decision not to acquire local knowledge may reflect the cost of this
acquisition.

 If the foreign partner views the task as complex, it may be dissuaded from acquiring additional knowledge.

Why are buyer-supplier relations often adversarial in a lot of industries? Cheung et al. (2011)

·Lack of goal congruence, cultural disparity
·Because the compete for the margin, level of competition. What the supplier earns more in margins, is what the buyer looses in margins.

How is performance in buyer-supplier relationship traditionally measured? Why is there a need to change this? Cheung et al. (2011)

·improve in product quality, on time delivery of orders, the ability of developing successful new products and reducing costs.
·Performance of a specific partner relative to other partners; They measure in on a relationship basis, not from a supplier, buyer perspective.

How do they collect the data, how do they prevent the subjective data from social desirability? Cheung et al. (2011)

·It is not a self-assessment, but the buyer rated the supplier and the other way around. à therefore the social desirability is prevented.

What are the three dimensions of relational learning and how do they relate to Bartlett and Ghoshal’s model of multinational corporation strategy? Cheung et al. (2011)

·Multidimensional construct consisting of information sharing, joint sense making and knowledge integration
·Closely follows the B&G model of MNC strategy, which argues that MNCs must seek local responsiveness for adaptability to diverse locations (via information sharing), worldwide learning to exploit innovations developed around the globe (through joint sense making with partner firms), and global integration for efficiency (via knowledge integration across partners)

How is buyer-supplier relationship performance measured in this study? Cheung et al. (2011)

·Multidimensional formative indicators that involved the construction of an index rather than a scale: The four indicators capture how the relationship with the supplier/buyer has helped improve product quality, on-time delivery of orders, the ability to develop successful new products for the marketplace, and reduce costs.

Does cultural difference influence the relationship between relational learning and dyad performance? Cheung et al. (2011)

·No moderating/influencing role found in their study

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo