Organisations and their structures

13 important questions on Organisations and their structures

As part of the concept organization, we have discussed basic assumptions. What are these, how do they evolve over time and what is the main problem?

Basic assumptions are the taken-for-granted, shared, implicit beliefs and values about what the world looks like (cognitive) and about how we relate to each other. Through basic assumptions we deal with problems (organizational survival) and interactions and integration.

Over time the basic assumptions become more implicit.

The main problem is that we get trapped in routines.

Goals and structure as an interaction premise: what is the difference between formal and informal goals / structure / infrastructural parts / technology?

The difference between formal and informal is that formal includes explicit formulation, and explicitly decided up on. Informal regards the things that are not based on procedures.

Difference between formal and informal regarding:
- Goals;
Formal goals e.g. Type of product, number of products etc.
Informal goals e.g. Emergent, enacted goals.

- Structure;
Formal: formally defined task structure
Informal: workarounds, side-stepping the hierarchy.

- Infrastructural parts;
Formal: membership, systems of accountability.
Informal: informal social norms about how organizational members interact with each other.

- Technology;
Formal: acquired machinery, ICT, tools, formally defined architecture.
Informal: Idiosyncratic/performative use of tools and space.

What are the three requirements of an adequate structure?

An adequate structure:

1. Supports interactions in two ways:
a) realizing societal contribution
b) have space to reflect and improve

2. Comply with cybernetic criteria:
a) the network of tasks (structure) is not the source of disturbances
b) within this network, tasks have enough regulatory potential to solve disturbances itself.

3. Have low parameter values

Note that using LVP, the first two requirements can be realized
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Why do high parameter value structures cause problems?

High parameter value structures cause problems because in sum they have a complex network of simple tasks, due to a lot of interactions and variety in order types a task has to deal with. This causes a source for disturbances and is problematic, because the probability of disturbances is high and the structure does not have enough regulatory potential to deal with it itself.

Why are low parameter value structures important?

In low parameter value structures, there in low structures the number of interactions is decreased, and there is limited variability between order types. This results in a simple network with more complex tasks.

The number of interactions is determined by the parameters separation and specialization.
The variability is determined by the parameter functional concentration. The variety of content depends on the number of orders.

What is the difference in the definition of structures regarding De Sitter and Mintzberg? And what is a task?

De Sitter: structures are the way tasks are defined and related into a network of tasks.

Mintzberg: structures are the way the main transformation of an organization is broken down into sub-tasks and then coordinated.

Definition of task: assigning operational and regulatory activities to capacities. The capacity is someone in an organizational unit.

Elaborate on the parameters: functional concentration, specialization of operational activities, separation and specialization of regulatory activities.

- Functional concentration; degree to which operational tasks are related to all order types.

- Specialization of operational activities; degree to which operational tasks cover only a small part of the complete operational process.

- Separation; degree to which operational and regulatory activities are assigned to different tasks.


- Specialization of regulatory activities; degree to which regulatory tasks are divided into small tasks with a small regulatory scope.

Why can it be stated that episodic interventions are realized for, in and by organizations?

Episodic interventions are related to organizations to fix problems (for), solve problems by altering something in the organization (in) and by means of organizational interaction against the background of premises that condition these interactions.

Based on which 3 relevant concepts can we describe what episodic interventions are?

1. Organizations
2. Organizational structures
3. Interventions

What are interaction premises and how do they condition interactions?

Interaction premises structure the production of interactions in several ways. Interaction premises include the infrastructure, basic assumptions and goals that condition interactions.

Interactions are seen as impermanent, whereas the premises have a more permanent character (but can still be changed). These premises are a normative point of reference that give direction to further interaction. E.g. If a goal is set, then it guides the interaction in terms that people want to realize that goal.

What is the relationship between the functional requirements and structure?

The functional requirements are influenced by the basic activities, which are based on the interaction premise including the infrastructure.

Why does structural development need experimentation?

Experimentation includes that you change interaction premises, and thereby interactions when these are not okay (do not fulfill societal contribution).

Structural development is about making a proper structure that facilitates creating societal contribution and is able to improve itself. When a structure is not able to do this, you change it via experimentation.

Some argue that inequality in organizations continuously reproduce and are very difficult to circument. How does this work?

In these situations people have a basic assumption that e.g. Women cannot be leaders. In organizations with HVP, operational and regulatory tasks are highly specialized, and separated, resulting in that someone of the minority is not able to show they can conduct certain tasks. So, it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy they cannot do it.

In LVP's there is less separation and specialization, causing the minority to show what they're capable of. The BA's get disconfirmed

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo