Business Law - The Differences between Common Law and Civil Law: Substansive Law - Breach of Contract and relevance of Fault
3 important questions on Business Law - The Differences between Common Law and Civil Law: Substansive Law - Breach of Contract and relevance of Fault
Breach of contract and relevance of fault: General Info
Breach of contract and relevance of fault: Civil Law
· § 280 I BGB: Damages for breach of duty: If the obliger breaches a duty arising from the obligation, the oblige may demand for the damage caused thereby. This does not apply if the obligor is not responsible for the breach of duty.
· The provisions state that the obligor will only be liable for harm caused intentionally and negligently. However, in certain causes fault is not necessary to claim damages (e.g., pursuant § 833 of the HGB – animal owner liability)
Breach of contract and relevance of fault: Common Law
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding