Evaluation of Policy Alternatives - MCCBA and its stages
10 important questions on Evaluation of Policy Alternatives - MCCBA and its stages
What is the central focus of the MCCBA?
- Measuring at different scales
- Finding a consensus-based aggregation of different impacts
What are the 4 blocks of the MCCBA?
- Basic evaluation structure (identify function, alternatives, scale, stakeholders, organize judgement criteria)
- Fact-finding on physical impacts
- Aggregation of impacts to a compact format (monetary or not)
- Communication of problem understanding
Why is block II, fact-finding, really important?
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
How are decision-makers and stakeholders in stage III, aggregation of impacts to a compact format, involved?
How are monetary values determined?
- Market-related valuation
- Willingness to pay
- Willingness to accept monetary values
What is the challenge of the MCCBA approach?
- Reduce the number of criteria to a minimum
- Use consensus-based judgement criteria and measures
How is the number of criteria reduced in the MCCBA?
- Incorporate causality
- Avoid double counting
- Avoid use of intermediate indicators
- Capture most important criterion
- Ignore criteria with low weight, or unclear, small impacts
In which way is consensus among stakeholders reached?
How can a ratio-analysis gain strength?
What are tools for sharing the increased problem understanding?
- Sensitivity analysis (important for accountability)
- Reconsideration of the project alternatives (needs explicit communication of problem understanding)
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding