Doing the right thing - The greatest happiness principle / Utilitarianism

9 important questions on Doing the right thing - The greatest happiness principle / Utilitarianism

Describe the two rival approaches to justice? (Sandel)

1 The morality of an action depends solely on the consequences it brings about. The right thing to do is whatever will produce the best state of affairs. All things considered.
2 Consequences are not all we should care about, morally speaking: certain duties and rights should command our respect, for reasons independent of social consequences.

Bentham's utilitarianism exerts a powerful hold on the thinking of policy-makers, economists, business executives, and ordinary citizens to this day. What are his 3 key statements?

1 The highest principle of morality is to maximize happiness, the overall balance of pleasure and pain
2 The right thing to do is whatever will maximize 'utility'. Whatever produces pleasure or happiness, and whatever prevent pain or suffering.
3 We are all governed by the feelings of pleasure and pain. They are our 'sovereign master'. They govern us in what we do and also determine what we ought to do.

Summarize the 3 main thoughts of Bentham and provide 2 objections:

-The highest principle of morality is to maximize happiness, the overall balance of pleasure and pain.
-Utility = whatever produces pleasure or happiness, and whatever prevents pain or suffering. Pain and pleasure are the sovereign masters.
-Government/laws/policies: do whatever maximizes the communities happiness.
Objection 1: individual rights (no respect to those rights)
Objection 2: A common currency of value (it weighs preferences without judging them and everyone's preferences count equally)
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Describe the two main objections against utilitarianism? (greatest happiness for biggest group)

1 It fails to respect human rights by caring only about the sum of satisfactions (individuals matters, but only in the sense that each person's preferences should be counted along with everyone else's. This violates fundamental norms of decency and respect for persons or minorities).
2 All values can't be captured by a common currency of value (utilitarianism claims to offer a science of morality, based on measuring, aggregating and calculating happiness. It weighs preferences without judging them. Everyone's preferences count equally. Think about case with the unsafe Ford car: can all values be translated into monetary terms?

What are the 2 objections regarding utilitarianism of Mill?

1 It does not give adequate weight to human dignity and individual rights.
2 It wrongly reduces everything of moral importance to a single scale of pleasure and pain.
>Mill tried to save utilitarianism by recasting it as a more humane, less calculating doctrine.

Summarize the thoughts of Mill, his answer to the 2 objections made to Bentham's utilitarianism:

-Answer to objection 1: Maximize utility, not by case but in the long run. Respecting individual liberty will lead to the greatest happiness.
-Answer to objection 2: distinguish higher and lower pleasures to assess to quality of our desires.

Mill thinks he can make this distinction between higher and lower pleasure, without relying on any moral ideas other than utility itself. What is meant with higher and lower pleasure?

Higher: those pleasures of virtues that produce stronger/longer pleasure (simple as that)
Lower: the opposite. Maybe perverse pleasures, like bloody spectacles (f.e. arena's), that violate the rights of the victims.
> The higher pleasures are not higher because we prefer them we prefer them because we recognize them as higher

Describe the 3 principles of liberty according to Mill?

1 People should be free to do whatever they want, provided they do no harm to others.
2 Government may not interfere with individual liberty in order to protect a person from himself, or to impose the majority's beliefs about how best to live
3 The only actions for which a person is accountable to society are those that affect others

Describe the problems (according to Van Dijk) with utilitarianism:

1 Not everything is measurable in money
2 The violation of fundamental rights
3 Availability of proper information
4 What are the sources of my happiness (for ex. pleasure by using drugs: not everybody will like this preference)

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo