Home / Summaries / Law and AI / algorithmic-decision-making-algorithms

Osvald, Marion, Algorithm-assisted decision-making in the public sector: framing the issues using administrative law rules governing discretionary power


7 important questions on Osvald, Marion, Algorithm-assisted decision-making in the public sector: framing the issues using administrative law rules governing discretionary power


How does the transparency of algorithmic tools, such as COMPAS and HART, influence public trust and accountability in the criminal justice system? To what extent does the disclosure of algorithmic methods and input data address concerns about fairness and bias in decision-making?

Transparency is foundational for accountability in algorithmic decision-making. While disclosing methods and input data is a step toward transparency, it's crucial to go beyond and provide a comprehensive understanding of the decision-making process. This includes detailing how algorithms are trained, potential biases, and the criteria used for decision outcomes. Transparency not only fosters public trust but also enables informed discussions about the ethical implications of algorithmic tools, particularly in critical areas like criminal justice.

Analyze the application of principles of natural justice, specifically the right to be heard, in the context of algorithm-assisted decisions. How might the duty to give reasons be reframed for algorithmic decision-making in the public sector? In what ways does the use of opaque algorithms impact the ability of individuals to understand and challenge decisions affecting their rights and freedoms?

Principles of natural justice, specifically the right to be heard and the duty to give reasons, must be adapted to suit the nuances of algorithmic decision-making. Reframing the duty to give reasons involves considering the circumstances in which explanations are essential. This includes ensuring that the data on which algorithms are trained align with the current situation, identifying situations where algorithmic outputs may be flawed, and recognizing instances where individual rights and freedoms are at stake. The challenge lies in balancing the need for transparency with the practicalities of complex algorithms.

Compare the transparency and disclosure practices of algorithmic tools in different jurisdictions, using examples such as COMPAS in the USA, HART in the UK, and the Allegheny Family Screening Tool. How do these practices align with principles of procedural fairness?
Assess the potential trade-offs between the statistical power of complex algorithms and their understandability, particularly in the context of decision-making with significant legal consequences.

Comparative analysis across jurisdictions highlights the diversity in transparency practices and their impact on fairness and bias. The trade-offs between algorithmic complexity and understandability are evident, with implications for public trust and the ability to engage in informed debates. While some tools may operate in secrecy, others, like the Allegheny Family Screening Tool, demonstrate the benefits of openness and public scrutiny in ensuring accountable decision-making.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart
Testimonial person
Sophia
Law student
Quotes

For my 1st exam I got a C. Then, I started looking for ways to learn better and I came across Study Smart. Since then I have scored a A+, A, A- and another A. I highly recommend it to everyone who wants to hear it. I am so happy with it!!

Testimonial person
John
Economics Student
Quotes

I was struggling to finish all my first-year subjects for 3 years. Then I discovered Study Smart, which helped me to finish all of them within 3 months.

Testimonial person
Sara
Public Administration Student
Quotes

Because of StudySmart, things are going well in many ways. Before, I always had study stress and no time for anything. Now I feel calm and confident (because of the program). I used to score a B, now I usually score an A or A+.

Testimonial person
Mary
Business Student
Quotes

Hey Chris, I really want to thank you very much for developing the platform, I usually got around C for my exams, now I scored an A+, an A and a A- !!

Testimonial person
Melanie
Psychology Student
Quotes

Since using Study Smart, my average has increased significantly. I even completed a statistics course with a A+ while I'm bad at statistics. I took on extra courses this year, because of Study Smart. Thanks so much!

Testimonial person
Jane
Nursing Studies
Quotes

Ever since I started studying with StudySmart I passed all my exams !!! No more re-sits!! At first, I was happy with a pass and now I only get good grades. Many thanks!

Testimonial person
Rose
Political Science Student
Quotes

I aced all the courses I studied with Study Smart. For law, I first scored a D, and now an A! I’m 100% sure that I’ll pass all the courses I study with Study Smart.

Testimonial person
Tina
Medicine Student
Quotes

I always thought I studied well. My grades were fine. I could never have imagined that applying these study skills would have such a huge and direct impact on my grades, my speed and the pleasure I have in learning.

Testimonial person
Julie
Marketing Student
Quotes

For the first time, I finally feel totally confident about the way I learn. I have the perfect overview and make great progress in terms of speed and the grades I get. Thanks, Chris!

Testimonial person
Matt
Industrial Engineering Student
Quotes

I immediately started to enjoy learning again, and my grades soared. All of a sudden, everything went better. I highly recommend Study Smart to all students..

Testimonial person
Emma
Law Student
Quotes

Being able to create my materials online made the process of studying so much smoother and quicker. I no longer have to spend a huge amount of my time on creating my summaries.

Testimonial person
Michael
Psychology Student
Quotes

At first, my notes were a mess. Now I use Study Smart to take my notes in a perfectly structured way. It helps me to save a lot of time and do other things I enjoy.

Testimonial person
Emily
Teacher
Quotes

Students that study with Study Smart get better grades. The system applies all the learning methods in such a way that both well-performing students and students who struggle perform much better.

Testimonial person
Richard
Literature Student
Quotes

Hi Chris, I would like to thank you very much. Last year I scored C on a course, and this year I got an A+ thanks to your method! Thank you very much!

Testimonial person
Madison
Parent
Quotes

The largest effect is that my child is more enthusiastic about school! Every parent wants their children to be happy at school, Study Smart made it happen.

Testimonial person
Robert
Accountant Student
Quotes

In high school, I failed several exams, and that has really changed now. I actually needed this tool very much back then. Since I started studying with StudySmart, I haven't had any D's. My average score is now an A and those are results I would have never had in the past

Testimonial person
James
Business and Science Student
Quotes

With my old method, I passed only 3 out of 8 courses. Since I started taking my notes digitally in Study Smart, I have passed all my courses on the first try. For me, StudySmart takes away the stress of wondering if I will pass or not.

Testimonial person
Christopher
Veterinarian Student
Quotes

Thanks to StudySmart, I passed all my exams, and with better grades than before! On top of that, I have mastered a very good study method now, which I am confident will help me earn my degree.

Examine the legal and ethical implications of algorithmic decision-making, considering the duty to provide explanations and the potential impact on the rule of law. How do these implications vary across different decision contexts, such as predictive policing and parole decisions? Discuss the challenges in ensuring that algorithm-assisted decisions adhere to administrative law principles, especially when dealing with highly complex and opaque models.

Algorithmic decision-making introduces legal and ethical challenges, particularly in contexts like predictive policing and parole decisions. Ensuring adherence to administrative law principles requires evidence of meaningful human involvement in the decision-making process. The duty to give reasons becomes crucial in justifying decisions, especially when algorithms are opaque. Balancing the potential benefits of automation with the need for accountability remains a central challenge in navigating the legal and ethical landscape.

Explore the argument that requiring explanations for algorithmic recommendations may set a higher standard for algorithms compared to human decision-makers. To what extent should algorithmic decision-making be held to the same standards of transparency and justification as human decisions? Assess the role of established frameworks in fields like medicine and law in ensuring accountability and justifiability of decisions, and compare these with the challenges posed by algorithmic decision-making.

Requiring explanations for algorithmic recommendations doesn't necessarily impose a higher standard; instead, it adapts standards to the unique characteristics of algorithmic decision-making. Comparisons with established frameworks in fields like medicine and law underscore the importance of accountability and justifiability in both human and algorithmic decisions. Ensuring that algorithms are not a black box and that their outputs can be scrutinized becomes essential for maintaining public trust.

Investigate the need for context-specific and nuanced approaches to algorithmic intelligibility. How can the design of interpretable tools balance the requirements of natural justice with the practicalities of different socio-technical contexts? Discuss the potential impact of algorithmic explanations on user acceptance and model improvement, considering the recommendations for a user-centric theoretical understanding of explanation production.

Context-specific and nuanced approaches to algorithmic intelligibility are critical for successful implementation. Designing interpretable tools should consider the requirements of natural justice while navigating the socio-technical contexts in which algorithms operate. Engaging users in the development process, providing explanations that contribute to user understanding, and facilitating iterative improvements are key components of ensuring both accountability and user acceptance.

Explore the issue of irrelevant and relevant considerations in algorithmic decision-making. How can the grounds on which algorithmic predictions are made be assessed for relevance, and what challenges exist in judging their lawfulness?


Assessing the relevance of considerations in algorithmic decision-making is challenging due to the opacity of decision grounds. A nuanced approach considers factors such as immediacy of decision, seriousness of outcome, and the impact on rights and freedoms. Tailoring the granularity of explanations to the specific context and user requirements becomes essential. Striking a balance between providing meaningful information and avoiding information overload is crucial for effective decision-making.

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

Law and AI

View summary
  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo

Summaries related to What is AI: De Spiegeleire, Stephan, Matthijs Maas, and Tim Sweijs