ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION - The paradigm shift in the administration justice
5 important questions on ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION - The paradigm shift in the administration justice
What is your perception of the current justice system?
They hold people to account and resolve conflicts, in accordance with the rule of law. The fact is that:
- their procedures are too complex and often not fit for purpose;
- the process of legal claims, accusations, defences and judgments leads to many procedural side-issues, enhances conflicts instead of mitigating them and is not always solving the underlying problem;
- procedures do not guarantee that solutions arrive in time, and managing costs is difficult.
Can online dispute resolution provide a breakthrough, or will it remain just another form of ADR, much talked about as a great method for managing conflict, but operating at the fringes of the legal system?
Could ODR supervise the negotiation process?
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Could ODR lower the necessary fees?
What are some of the positive aspects of ODR?
- More adequate solutions
- Arriving just in time
- Less risk of escalation
- More voice and participation
- More control over costs
ODR systems also enable cooperation between Courts from different jurisdictions, and sharing experiences and costs of developments can greatly enhance the quality of adjudication services.
The processes for treatment of frequent and urgent justiciable problems can be brought to a level of international best practices, benefiting from a much broader range of trial and error experiences in different contexts.
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding