Leading a Culture of Innovation
47 important questions on Leading a Culture of Innovation
What do Jung, Chow, and Wu present as an important factor in enhancing organizational innovation?
Transformational leadership -> empowerment -> organizational innovation (r2=0.02)
intotal r2=0.48
What is necessary according to Ahmed for an organization for increasing the innovative output?
What is Reverse engineering
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
In Synergy, diversity will lead to...cohesion will lead to....and the interaction will lead to...
In Synergy, team performance will lead to outcomes through two things, which?
Living abroad predicts creativity, give the mediation level and its correlation.
adaptation | 0.35
^ V
0.01 |
time lived abroad --r=0.01--> creativity
What is a T-shaped employee
Collective intelligence factor (c) predicts the performance of humans groups, which ones do not predict c and which do.
tested were: social sensitivity, speaking turn variance, and percent female.
do: social sensitivity is as the only one significant correlated to C.
What does the studie tell us about physical proximity and social ties?
What is a tangible shared goal?
How can you minimize status within the team and create status for the team?
minimizing status within group: run the organization by ideas, not hierarchy.
What is autonomy and name 3 basic elements
1) choice over task
2) choice over time
3) choice over technique
What is the set-up strategies which lead to team processes.
shared goals, norms, shared activities leads to cohesion. status maximized for the group and minimized within the group leads to empowerment.
Teams in Organisations: What is a team?
Team in Organisations: What are the 5 key defining characteristics of teams?
- Exist to achieve a shared goal
- members are interdependent regarding a common goal
- are bounded and remain relatively stable over time
- members have the authority to manage their own work and internal processes
- operate in a larger social system context
What is a working group?
State 2 reasons why organisations should have teams (Team in Org.):
- Teams and teamwork are not a novel concept
- teams can be more effective than traditional hierarchical structure for making decisions quickly and efficiently.
What is a manager-led team?
What is a self-managing or self-regulating team?
What is a self-directing or self-designing team?
What is a self-governing team?
Team in Org.: What is the most common type of teams?
Team in Org.: team size
Team in Org.: What are the 6 most desired aspects of managerial education?
- Developing and sustaining high motivation
- Developing clear goals
- Fostering creativity and innovation
- Training
- Minimising confusion and coordination problems
Team in Org.: What are the 3 steps (with sub steps) to develop your team-building sills?
- Sampling on the dependent variable
- Hindsight bias
3. Skill 3: Expert Learning
- Single-loop versus double-loop learning
- Inert knowledge problem
What is the inert knowledge problem?
What is the misattribution error?
What is single-loop learning?
Jung, Chow & Wu (2003): Transformational leadership emphasises longer-term and vision-based motivational processes. This leadership style is characterised as being composed of 4 unique but interrelated behavioural components. Name them!
- inspirational motivation (articulating an appealing and/or evocative vision)
- intellectual stimulation (promoting creativity and innovation)
- idealised influence (charismatic role modelling)
- individualised consideration (coaching and mentoring)
Jung, Chow & Wu (2003): What were their 4 hypotheses? (just hypotheses, not results!)
H 2: Transformational leadership is positively related to employees’ perceptions of (a) empowerment and (b) support for innovation.
H 3: Employees’ perceptions of (a) empowerment and (b) support for innovation have a positive relationship with organizational innovation.
H 4: Employees’ perceptions of (a) empowerment and (b) support for innovation moderate the relationship between transformational leadership and organisational innovation such that the relationship will be stronger when perceived empowerment/support for innovation is high rather than low.
Jung, Chow & Wu (2003): Explanation for their unexpected results regarding hypotheses 3 and 4:
2.3 What are the three steps of innovation?
- idea generation phase (self-explanatory),
- structured methodology phase – consists of some type of stage-gate system (hoops which the new idea must pass in order to demonstrate its feasibility and compatibility),
- commercialization – the product is produced to allow extraction of value from all that has been created in the earlier phases.
2.3 Innovation cultures and innovation climates: what are the 4 dimensions of climate defined by Scheider et al (1996)?
- nature of interpersonal relationships (e.g., is there trust or mistrust?; are relationships reciprocal and based on collaboration, or are they competitive?),
- nature of hierarchy (e.g., are decisions made centrally or through consensus and participation?; is there a spirit of teamwork or is work more or less individualistic?),
- nature of work (e.g., is work challenging or boring?; are jobs tightly defined as produce routines or do they provide flexibility?),
- focus of support and rewards (e.g., what aspects of performance are appraised and rewarded?; what projects and actions/behaviors get supported?).
2.3 What is the difference between explicit and implicit culture?
2.3 The degree to which a change in implicit culture can occur is dependent ton the strength of culture. The strength of culture depends primarily on two things:
proportion of members holding strongly to specific beliefs and standards
of behaviors).
(2)Match between the implicit and explicit aspects of culture.
2.3 Another way of looking at culture is in terms of cultural norms. Essentially, norms vary along two dimensions:
there exist both intensity and crystallization (or consensus) that strong
cultures exist.
2.3 What are the 4 cultural traits and values identified by Dennison & Mishra (1995) that are associated with cultural effectiveness?
- Involvement
- Consistency
- However, it can have both positive (provides integration and coordination) and negative (highly consistent -> resistant to change) organizational consequences.
- Adaptability, or the capacity for internal change in response to external conditions
- Sense of mission or long-term vision
- A mission provides purpose and meaning, and a host of non-economic reasons why the organization’s work is important.
2.3 Organic structures promote innovation. What are examples of organic structures?
2.3 Mechanistic structures hinder innovation. What are examples of mechanistic structures?
2.3 Does culture hinder or enhance the process of creativity and innovation?
2.3 What are important norms that can activate creativity? (14)
- challenge & belief in action (employees' involvement in daily operations)
- freedom and risk-taking
- dynamism and future orientation
- external orientation
- trust and openness
- debates
- cross-functional interaction and freedom
- myths & stories (degree to which success stories are designed and celebrated)
- Leadership commitment and involvement
- Awards and rewards (manner in which successes (and failures) are celebrated and rewarded)
- Innovation time and training
- Corporate identification and unity
- organisational structure - autonomy and flexibility
2.3 Corporate missions, philosophy statements & innovation culture: what makes a philosophy statement effective? According to Ledford et al. (1994), an effective statement consists of four basic guiding principles to bring a statement to life:
descriptions.
(2)Install an effective communication and implementation process.
(3)Creates strong linkage between the philosophy and the systems governing
behavior.
(4)Have an ongoing process of affirmation and renewal.
2.3 In order to build a successful and sustainable culture of innovation, leadership needs to accomplish two broad tasks:
- Leaders need to be acutely sensitive to their environment and acutely aware of the impact that they themselves have on those around them.
- Leaders need to have the ability to accept and deal with ambiguity. Tolerance of ambiguity allows space for risk taking, and exploration of alternative solution spaces, which do not always produce business results.
2.3 Characteristics that distinguish highly innovative firms against less innovative companies are as follows: (4 points)
- Top management commits both financial and emotional support to innovation.
- Top management has to ensure that realistic and accurate assessments of the markets are made for the planned innovation. Highly innovative firms are close to the end users, and are accurately able to assess potential demand.
- Top management ensures that innovation projects get the necessary support from all levels of the organisation.
- Top management ensures that structured methodology/systems are set in place so that each innovation goes through a careful screening process prior to actual implementation.
2.3 Actions that need to be addressed in order for the empowerment to contribute to innovation: (5 points)
- Establish meaningful ‘actions’ boundary: Successful companies need to draw ‘actions’ boundary through a process of explicitly defining the domain of action and the priority, and the level of responsibility and empowerment provided to reach these ends.
- Define risk tolerance
- Structure involvement
- Accountability: A very common problem in empowered innovation is that everyone is encouraged to participate in cross-functional process involvement, to an extent that almost everybody loses track of who is accountable for what.
- Action orientation rather than bureaucracy orientation
2.3 Key distinguishing factor between innovative and less innovative firms is the ability of management to create a sense of...
2.3 What are the two types of autonomy in innovative firms?
(b) operational autonomy – the freedom to attack a problem, once it has been
set by the organization, in ways that are determined by the individual self.
Operational autonomy encourages a sense of the individual and promotes entrepreneurial spirit, whereas strategic autonomy is more to do with the level of alignment with organizational goals. What works best is a balance between operational and strategic autonomy!
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding