Introduction to international environmental law 2 (compliance and enforcement)

21 important questions on Introduction to international environmental law 2 (compliance and enforcement)

How do you usually have enforcement in int evir law?

Based on treaty provisions
• In general
– Report to Conference of the Parties (COP)
There is a reporting mechanisms in most treaties, they will have an obligation to report certain things to a committee to sort of check if they are in compliance of the treaty
– Bring a dispute before ICJ or other court/tribunal
Usually in treaties there is a provision which states which court has jurisdiction over a matter concerning the treaty, however when this is not the case jurisdiction is usually a choice of the states

What is a complaince committee?

nstituted in a treaty, for example: Compliance Committee Kyoto Protocol on
climate change

What can a complaince committee do?

Facilitative Branch (helps states to comply)
» Enforcement Branch (imposes sanctions)
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What is very rare in the kyoto enforcement?

ery rare in international law. The Kyoto Protocol’s enforcement branch was killed
in the Paris Agreement. Only the non-punitive facilitative role remains

What if there is no treaty, can there still be enforcement?

Rules of general international law apply always, also in the absence of
relevant treaty provisions (for example: no harm principle)

What are some of the problems that arise with the enforcement?



Problem: areas beyond national jurisdiction, such as the high seas, the
Antarctic, space. Can states be injured there? (see Whaling case and
Nuclear Test cases later)

How does the icj provide enforcement in envir. Law?

Contentious cases between states
• Usually only when both states accept jurisdiction in specific case
• Interim measures of protection; imminent threat of irreparable damage (for
example: Pulp Mills case)
• Advisory opinions (exciting AO pending: Vanuatu climate change)
• Chamber for environmental matters (1993-2006), 0 cases...

What are some special enforcement bodies? (4)



Specific dispute settlement institutions
• International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), deals with disputes arising out of
the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), in Hamburg, Germany (see
further session 10)
• World Trade Organization (WTO) Appellate body (& Dispute Settlement Body, ad hoc
panels on trade disputes)
• Ad hoc tribunals, instituted to deal with a specific conflict (example: Trail Smelter
tribunal of Canada and USA)
• Permanent Court of Arbitration, in The Hague, Netherlands (not a court, arbiters of
both states involved come up with a settlement, example: Iron Rhine case)

Which regional court in the eu can you use?

Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU, Luxemburg) for all
matters related to EU law. However, the EU and its member states
are often a party to international conventions, in which case a
conflict of courts may arise

When has the CJEU jurisdiction?



hen EU is a party: CJEU has jurisdiction
– CJEU explains provisions of Aarhus Convention in Slovak Bears
case, case C-240/09 (2011)
– CJEU has to be addressed by Member States in case of conflict. In
the MOX Plant Case, case 459/03 (2006), the Court condemned
Ireland for having addressed the ITLOS on a dispute with the UK
on radioactive contamination of the Irish Sea (based on the
current Art. 344 TFEU)

What are three regional hr courts?

.Regional human rights courts
• European Court of Human Rights (Strasbourg, France)
• Inter-American Court of Human Rights (San José, Costa Rica)
• African Court on Human and Peoples Rights (Arusha, Tanzania)

What options do individuals or ngo's have?



• No! Conflicts between states only (agreements between states!)
• Exception: human rights
• Many proposals for International Court for the Environment... never adopted
• Domestic courts... depends on domestic law
• Aarhus Convention on access to justice in environmental matters (see session 4)

Under which system is the most envir case law?

Most environmental case law under WTO on Article XX GATT
(“General Exceptions”). Disputes often on TBT Agreement (technical
barriers to trade)

Who dispute settlement body, is this easy? And name an exemple dolphin case?

.In general: difficult to protect global environment through trade
restrictions. Art. XX GATT opportunities are hard to materialize.
Examples:
• 1991, 1994, 2011 tuna cases between Mexico and the USA.
Mexico objected against various measures imposed in the
US in order to prevent the sale of tuna caught under
conditions that lead to the death of dolphins (dolphins caught
up in fishing nets)
– Unilateral action is not allowed. A product ban is impossible. Even
voluntary ‘dolphin safe’ labelling was considered to have
impermissible extra-jurisdictional scope.

What is the turtle shrimp casE?

.Shrimp-turtle cases (1998 & 2001),
between Thailand and the USA. The USA had banned the
sale of shrimp that were caught using methods that might kill
sea turtles and required fishermen to use TED devices
(“turtle excluding devices”):
– No unilateral technology requirements can be imposed
– States involved have to negotiate agreements, taking into account
circumstances of each country, in this case especially the position of
subsistence (poor) fishermen (who cannot afford such technology)

What is the beef hormone case?

.Beef hormones case (1997), in which the EU tried to ban
beef from the US treated with hormones, invoking the
precautionary principle
– The precautionary principle is not a principle of customary
international law and cannot be relied upon under WTO law

Who can enforce in int. Environment law?

only states can start compliance procedures o This concept of an injured state is the starting point of wanting to start a compliance procedure

What is the reality of enforcement in environmental law?

In reality there is little compliance with international environmental law, so the few cases that do exist are incredibly important, however there are all kind of problems and reasons (political, economic, etc.) why states don’t want to bring other states to the court for compliance

What is the background on the environmental chamber and why did it fail?

In the 90s there was a wave of environmental awareness, and so they created this chamber thinking there were going to be a lot of cases on environmental matters. However it is useless. Because they had 0 cases they closed the chamber again. The reason for 0 cases is again the reluctance of states to bring other states to court regarding Gedownload door Esmee De Koning (esmay100@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|5097417 environmental matters. They see it as a last resort, they will try negotiating, mediation etc. first

How do tribunals work?

Ad hoc tribunals, instituted to deal with a specific conflict (example: Trail Smelter tribunal of Canada and USA)  States can decide to create a tribunal for one specific case/conflic o Permanent Court of Arbitration, in The Hague, Netherlands (not a court, arbiters of both states involved come up with a settlement, example: Iron Rhine case)

How does the jurisdiction of the CJEU work exactly? Provision of aarhus convention.

CJEU explains provisions of Aarhus Convention in Slovak Bears case, case C-240/09 (2011) o In this case the EU said we also signed this convention so the CJEU is also competent as a court. The Court of Justice of the EU then explains international law in an European Context. An European Court is interpreting things in an European context while the international courts are interpreting things in an international context

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo