Different cost allocations
5 important questions on Different cost allocations
What is a death spiral?
Using full cost transfer pricing & allowing the users to buy from the market may cause death spiral
Reduction in product/service demand --> spreading costs to the smaller number --> average cost per unit rises --> demand drops
How to avoid death spiral?
- charge users only for variable costs
- alternatively, reduce the total amount of fixed costs allocated
- excess demands then need to be met by outsourcing
Use practical capacity instead of actual utilization to calculate the overhead per unit
- are all services irregular? Can we standardize some?
- average number of processing hours over period
Why allocate service department costs to operating costs?
Can be used to approximate hard to observe externalities. E.g. Hiring persons puts extra burdon on IT or HR. Rational users will pay a transfer price only when the benefits are greater than costs
Compare internal service departments to external vendors. Gross inefficiency is revealed when internal transfer prices exceed external prices
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
How does firm value change by allocating HR costs?
If average cost is decreasing --> cost allocation may do more harm than good
How to allocate service department costs to operating units?
Goes straight to department. Is quick simple and commonly used. Downside: true relationship? Ignores the fact that service departments serve each other.
STEP-DOWN
Partial recognition of the services transferred between support services. E.g. IT supports accounting. Step from support --> accounting
RECIPROCAL
Recognizes mutual support services. Up and down from IT to accounting. Yet is not intuitive and complex, often small differences
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding