Social networks and creativity

14 important questions on Social networks and creativity

Perry-Smith & Shalley (2003) - Strong ties characteristics and benefits

Characteristics:
Frequent interaction
High emotional closeness
Reciprocity

Benefits:
Routines & norms
Create conformity
Similarity between actors
Repciprocity

Perry-Smith & Shalley (2003) - Weak ties characteristics and benefits

Characteristics:
Infrequent interaction
Low emotional closeness
One-way exchanges

Benefits
New ideas & innovation
Facilitate autonomy
Diversity of actors
Flexibility

Perry-Smith & Shalley (2003) - Centrality benefits and downsides

Benefits:
Access to more information from inside the organization
Higher status and power
Calculated risk taking

Downsides:
Pulled in too many directions
Information overload
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Perry-Smith & Shalley (2003) - Periphery benefits

  • Access to more information from outside the organization
  • New ideas and approaches
  • Boundary spanning
  • Early adopter

Obstfeld (2005) - Sparse social networks strengths:

  • Creativity
  • Weak ties
  • Combination of ideas
  • Access to unique information
  • Diverse experiences
  • Control and different interests

Obstfeld (2005) - Dense social networks strengths:

  • Implementing innovation
  • Strong ties
  • Mobilization of people
  • Locus of shared knowledge
  • Shared trust and norms
  • Cooperation and alignment of interests

Long Lingo & O'Mahony (2010) - Tertius Gaudens characteristics:

  • Strategy of disunion
  • Structural conception of brokerage
  • Individual benefits and social capital
  • Information advantage
  • Produce creative ideas
  • Separation of disparate fields

Long Lingo & O'Mahony (2010) - Tertius Iungens characteristics:

  • Strategy of union
  • Practice conception of brokerage
  • Common goals and social capital
  • Implementation advantage
  • Synthesize creative ideas
  • Integration of disparate fields

Long Lingo & O'Mahony (2010) - Four levels of brokerage

  1. Making parties on either side of the structural hole aware
  2. Transferring knowledge from one group to another
  3. Drawing analogies from one group to another
  4. Synthesizing ideas from multiple sources

Long Lingo & O'Mahony (2010) - Three types of ambiguity:

  1. Definitions of quality (what should the creative process produce)
  2. Occupational jurisdictions (who should control the creative process)
  3. Transformation process (how can the creative work can be produced)

Perry-Smith & Mannucci (2017) - Social network characteristics

  • Weak ties (non-redundant connections to different circles)
  • Strong ties (trust and cooperation)
  • Structural holes (access to diverse information)

Perry-Smith & Mannucci (2017) - Four phases in the idea journey and the needed support

  1. Idea generation > cognitive flexibility
  2. Idea elaboration > support & feedback
  3. Idea championing > influence & legitimacy
  4. Idea implementation > shared vision & understanding

Perry-Smith & Mannucci (2017) - Limitations of network activation fluidity

  • Weak ties may be difficult to reactivate
  • Strong ties create expectation to be involved in all phases

Clement et al. (2017) - Positive and negative externalities of brokerage

Positive: spillover information from other networks
Negative: limits to the effort and attention of hubs to contribute to their own communities.

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo