Entering Foreign Markets

23 important questions on Entering Foreign Markets

Two ways liability of foreigness manifests


First, numerous differences in formal and informal institutions govern the rules of the game in different countries

Second, although customers in this age of globalization supposedly no longer discriminate against foreign firms, the reality is that foreign firms are often still discriminated against either formally or informally.

How do firms crack new markets?

To deploy overwhelming resources and capabilities that after offsetting the liability of foreignness, there is still some competitive advantage

Industry-based considerations on the degree of competitiveness

  1. Rivalry among firms
  2. Entry barriers/scale economies
  3. Bargaining power of suppliers
  4. Bargaining power of buyers
  5. Substitute products/services
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Institution-based considerations on country risks

  1. Regulatory risks
  2. Trade barriers
  3. Currency risks
  4. Cultural distances
  5. Institutional norms

Rivalry among established firms may

Prompt certain moves, especially those in oligopolistic industries often match each other in foreign entries or to retaliate

The higher the entry barriers

The more intense firms will be in attempting to compete abroad. A strong presence overseas in itself can be seen as a major entry barrier

Bargaining power of suppliers

may prompt certain foreign market entries: often called vertical integration

Extensive backward integration

I.E. Bauxite mining in order to provide a steady supply of raw materials to late-stage production (such as aluminium smelting)

Bargaining power of buyers may lead to certain foreign market entries

Often called forward vertical integration ( such as Apple establishing applestores instead of working with retail chains)

The market potential of substitute products

may encourage firms to bring firms to bring them abroad ( camera makers Fuji en Kodak vs Apple and Samsung and phone cameras)

The organization of firm-specific resources

And capabilities as a bundle favors firms with strong complementary assets integrated as a system and encourages them to utilize these assets overseas

Well-known regulatory risk

Obsolescing bargain

3 rounds of obsolescing bargain

  1. MNE and government negotiate a deal. The MNE is usually not willing to enter in the absence of government assurance of property rights, earnings or incentives
  2. MNE enters and if all is well and earns profits that may become visible
  3. The government, often pressured by domestic political groups may demand renegotiations of the deal seems to yield " excessive " profits to foreign firms

Local content requirements

Mandating that a " domestically produced" product can still be subject to tariff and non-tariff barriers unless a certain fraction of its value (such as 51% in the U.S.) is truly produced domestically.

Natural resource seeking

Possession of natural resources and related transport and communication infrastructure ( oil in the Middle East, Russia and Venezuela)

Benefits large scale entries

the demonstration of strategic commitment to certain markets and assures local customers and suppliers

Drawbacks large scale entries


1. Limited strategic flexibility
2. Huge losses if these " large-scaled" bets turn out to be wrong

Choice of entry: Non-equity modes

  1. Exports
  2. Direct exports
  3. Indirect exports
  4. others


Strategic alliances:
  1. contractual agreements
  2. Licensing/franchising
  3. Turnkey projects
  4. R&D contracts
  5. Co-marketing

Choice of entry: Equity (FDI) modes


Strategic alliances
  1. joint ventures (JVs)
  2. Minority JVs
  3. 50/50 Jvs
  4. Majority Jvs


Wholly owned subsidiaries (WOS)
  1. Greenfields
  2. Acquisitions
  3. others

3 principal advantages of MNE


Ownership
Location
Internalization

Contractual (non-equity-based) alliances

Include co-marketing, research and development, (R&D) contracts, turnkey projects, strategic suppliers, strategic distributors, and licensing/franchising

Industry-based considerations ( strategic alliances & networks)

  1. Collaboration among rivals (horizontal alliances)
  2. Entry barriers scaled by alliances
  3. Upstream/downstream vertical alliances with suppliers/buyers
  4. Alliances and networks to provide substitute products/services

Resource-based considerations ( strategic alliances & networks)

  1. Value-added must outweigh costs
  2. Rarity of relational capabilities and desirable partners
  3. Imitability of firm-specific and relationship-specific capabilities
  4. Organization of alliance activities at the firm and relationship levels

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo