Parasuraman: a conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research

11 important questions on Parasuraman: a conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research

Quality in tanigble goods has been described and measured. Quality in  services is undefined and not researched. Parasureman wants to rectify  this situation, how? (4)

By:
1 Reviewing the studies that have investigated service quality
2 Reporting the insights obtained in an extensive exploratory investigation of quality in four service businesses
3 Developing a model of service quality
4 Offering propositions for further research

Which 3 characteristics of services must be aknowledged? (Parasuraman)

Intangibility, heterogeneity, inseparability (production and consuming are never separated)

What is service quality according to Parasuraman?

Service quality is a measure of how well the service level delivered, matches customer expectations.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Which 2 types of service quality exist? (Parasuraman)

Technical quality: what the customer is actually receiving from the service
Functional quality: the manner in which the service is delivered

Through in-depth focus groups interviews an important insight is  obtained: a set of key gaps exist in regarding executive perceptions of  service quality and the tasks associated with service delivery for  customers. These gaps can be major hurdles in attempting to deliver a  service which customers would perceive as being of high quality. Name  the first (of five) gaps? (Parasuraman)

Consumer expectation - management perception gap: service firms may not always understand...
1 What features connote (impliceren) high quality to consumers in advance
2 What features a service must have in order to meet customer needs
3 What levels of performance on those features are needed to deliver high quality service
>> This  leads to proposition 1: the gap between consumer expectations and  management perceptions of those expectations will have an impact on the  consumer's evaluation of service quality.

Through in-depth focus groups interviews a important insight is  obtained: a set of key gaps exist in regarding executive perceptions of  service quality and the tasks associated with service delivery for  customers. These gaps can be major hurdles in attempting to deliver a  service which customers would perceive as being of high quality. Name  the second (of five) gaps? (Parasuraman)

Management perception - service quality specification gap.
A variety  of factors (resource constraints, market conditions, management  indifference) may result in a gap between manager perceptions of  consumer expectations and the actual specifications established for a  service. F.e. executives in the repair service firm were fully aware  that consumers seek quick response to breakdowns as a vital ingredients  of high service quality. However they find it difficult to deliver it.
>> This  leads to proposition 2: the gap between management perceptions of  consumer expectations and the firm's service quality will affect service  quality from the consumer's point of view

Gap 1-4 are the marketer-producer side (gap 5 is the consumer side). Can  cap 1-4 be favorable or unfavorable for the firm? (Parasuraman)

They can be both from a service quality perspective. F.e. gap 3 will be  favorable when the service delivery exceeds specifications, it will be  unfavorable when the specifications are not met.

Only 2 (tangibles, credibility) of the 10 (reliability, responsiveness,  competence, access, courtesy (hoffelijkheid), communication, security,  understanding/knowing the customer) determinants of service quality, can  be known in advance of the purchase. This leads to a low number of  search properties (zoekeigenschappen). Till what proposition does this  lead according to Parasuraman?

Proposition 7: consumers typically rely on experience properties when evaluating service quality.

The position of a consumer's perception of service quality on the  continuum depends on the nature of the discrepancy between expected and  perceived service. Till which proposition does this lead? (Parasuraman)

Proposition 8:
A When expected service is higher than the perceived  service, perceived quality is less than satisfactory and will tend  toward totally unacceptable quality, with increased discrepancy between  expected and perceived service.
B When expected and perceived services are equal, the perceived quality is satisfactory
C  When the expected service is lower than the perceived service,  perceived quality is more than satisfactory and will tend toward ideal  quality, with increased discrepancy between experienced and perceived  service.

Summarize the model of Parasuraman:

The research revealed 10 dimensions that consumers use in forming  expectations about and perceptions of services. The research also  pinpointed (lokaliseerde) four gaps on the service provider's side that  are likely to affect service quality as perceived by consumers.

Describe the SERVQUAL instrument of Parasuraman? It is toward common dimension of service delivery (5)

1 Tangibles: appearance of facilities, personnel
2 Reliability: deliver as promised
3 Responsiveness: willingness to help
4 Assurance (competence/courtesy/credibility/security/trust/confidence/ knowledge of employees)
5 Empathy (acces/communication/understanding/caring/attention)

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo