Kuester et al. (1999): Retaliatory behavior to new product entry

15 important questions on Kuester et al. (1999): Retaliatory behavior to new product entry

What is the paper by Kuester et al. (1999) focussing on?

This study focuses on the defence strategies that firms pursue when threatened by rival new products in their markets.

What is the objective and the perspective of the paper by Kuester et al. (1999)?

  • The objective of this research is to provide insight in the phenomenon of competitive retaliation by identifying the factors that influence defence decisions.
  • The perspective is that of a firm threatened by a rival product, rather than by a new competitor.

Explain the figure ''Conceptualization of Reactions to Competitive Entry''.

When there is a competitive entry, the other firms in the market have two options: no retaliation or retaliation.
  • No Retaliation has 3 dimensions: Entry ignored, withdrawal & accomodation
  • Retaliation has 5 dimensions: Instrument, intensity, breadth, speed & domain
    • 4 parts of instrument: Product-, price-, promotion- & distribution mix
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What are the 5 dimensions of relatiation and what do they entail?

  1. Instrument
    • Retaliatory move using the same or another marketing instrument. Using the same marketing instrument = reciprocal retaliation.
  2. Intensity
    • The weight placed behind the marketing instrument
  3. Breadth
    • The number of marketing instruments used to retaliate
  4. Speed
    • Reaction speed, time lag between the competitive threat and respons
  5. Domain
    • The market in which the defender counterattacks

Explain the conceptual model of the paper by Kuester et al. (1999)?

  • On the left side, the characteristics are displayed.
    • Entrant: Innovativeness & Perceived Threat
    • Incumbent: Incumbent size & Exit Costs
    • Industry: Maket growth, Industry concentration & Price sensitivity
  • On the right side, the dimensions of retaliation are displayed
    • Intensity of product retaliation
    • Intensity of price retaliation
    • Retaliation speed
    • Retaliation breadth
  • They are researching whether these characteristics have an influence on the dimensions of retaliation and whether there is a relationship between price retaliation and retaliation speed

From previous research on defence it turned out that three categories of factors potentially can explain incumbent defence mechanisms to new product entry. Which three factors?

  • Entrant characteristics
  • Industry characteristics
  • Incumbent characteristics

Result: When the rival new product is very innovative, is it more or less likely that the defender will use product-based instruments to counterattack?

It is more likely. Innovativeness has a significant positive effect on product-related retaliaton, so reciprocal retaliation behavior is evident in this study.

Result: Competitors in highly concentrated markets react
more or less strongly and more of less quickly on the product mix?

Less strongly and less quickly

Most incumbents indicates that they reacted to the competitive new product. 93% reacted on at least one marketing mix element. Did most of them use the product or price dimension to do this?

Reactions were most frequently on the product dimension

Most incumbents indicates that they reacted to the competitive new product. 93% reacted on at least one marketing mix element. Did most of them use the product or price dimension to do this?

Reactions were most frequently on the product dimension

In conditions of price sensitivity, firms try to respond more broadly. What is the reason for this?

Because competition that is based solely on price can be very harmful

Result: On which two dimensions of retaliation has price sensitivity an effect?

  • On price
  • On speed of reaction

Result: Do industry concentration and incumbent size have a positive or negative impact on the strength of product retaliaton?

Negative effect

What are the 6 main results of the study by Kuester et al. (1999)?

  • The more innovative a rival new product, the more likely it is that the defender will use product-based instruments
  • Innovative products slow the incumbent’s response
  • Market growth has positive effect on both product retaliation and reaction speed.
  • Larger firms react more slowly and less strongly on product dimension when challenged by new product introduction.
  • Highly concentrated markets usually are populated by larger firms → industry concentration has a negative effect on strength of product retaliation.
  • Price sensitivity has significant effect on retaliation through price and on speed of reaction

What is the managerial implication of the paper by Kuester et al. (1999)?

With this study they know when to expect reactions and in what form in the situation of new product entry

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo