Visual Agnosia

13 important questions on Visual Agnosia

What skills are visual agnosia patients capable of and what are they not capable of?

Capable of:
- low-level vision i.e. intact primary visual pathways (they can physically see the object)
- memory i.e. they know what the object is
- object knowledge
- language i.e. they can describe the object
- object recognition from touch i.e. they cannot recognise objects in vision but they can through touch

Incapable of:
- objection recognition from sight

= pure deficit in object recognition

What are the subtypes of agnosia?

  • Apperceptive
Inability to recognise visual objects due to a deficit in perceptual processing

  • Associative (integrative)
Perception normal but process of associating object’s percept with its meaning is impaired i.e. inability to access stored info about objects using info

What are mild deficits of Apperceptive Agnosia?

Usually occur following unilateral lesions to lateral occipital cortex

Deficits:
- Incomplete drawings of objects (Street, 1931)
- Ghent overlapping figure test (De Renzi et al., 1969)
- Unusual views test (Warrington & Taylor, 1973) - i.e. they can only recognise the object from a typical viewpoint
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What is converging evidence for the role of lateral occipital complex (LO or LOC) in shape processing?

  • Increased fMRI activation during object and shape processing - (Review: Grill-Spector, Kourtzi & Kanwisher , 2001)
  • TMS over LO disrupts the processing of a shape discrimination task (Ellison & Cowey, 2006)

Regarding Appercetive Agnosia, is the problem primary visual processing?

Serino et al. (2014):
- Patient SDV with apperceptive agnosia as determined based on typical profile of impairment
- Central visual field defect + severe problem with line orientation processing

---> Primary visual processing deficit could underlie some cases of apperceptive agnosia

Who is the classic Associative Agnosia patient?

Patient FRA (McCarthy & Warrington, 1986)

- Awoke one day and was unable to read.
- Well preserved language, spatial, visual and perceptual abilities

- Impaired recognition of visually presented common objects

---> Damage to left fusiform gyrus

What is the problem with single case studies?

Only 1 patient so cannot apply to general population

What is are 2 distinctions between apperceptive agnosia and associative agnosia?

Apperceptive agnosia - impaired drawing and matching
Associative agnosia - intact drawing and matching

Lesion:
Apperceptive agnosia - bilateral lesion to lateral occipital cortex
Associative agnosia - left fusiform gyrus

Describe everyday life with visual agnosia?

- Intact hearing, sense of touch, smell, etc.
- Intact memory, cognition, speech, etc.
- Relatively good obstacle avoidance
- Better object recognition with real objects than pictures

Examples of difficulties:
- shopping
- cannot read
- driving

Who was Unteroffizier S (Bodamer, 1947)?

- After a head wound he could not recognise any faces
- Could distinguish the elements of a face, but he had no sense that the features made a face

= Suggests a disorder of basic face perception

What do patients with prosopagnosia rely on for person identification?

Non facial cues (e.g. clothing, voice)

Who is the classic prosopagnosia patient?

Patient IE
- Anterograde amnesia and achromatopsia
- Prosopagnosia


---> Good at recognising 3D and everyday 2D objects. Some difficulty with more obscure objects and silhouettes.

---> Cannot recognise any faces
- Difficulty recognising gender, age...
- Impaired at deciding if two faces are of the same person

Lesion

Lesion to undersurface of occipital lobes bilaterally and to left hippocampus:

  • Damage to bilateral fusiform face area (FFA)  (prosopagnosia)
  • Left V4 (achromatopsia)
  • Left hippocampus (amnesia)

Do agnosia and prosopagnosia frequently co-occur?

Yes - but not always

There are patients with preserved face recognition and impaired object recognition (agnosia), and patients with preserved object recognition and impaired face recognition (prosopagnosia)

---> This suggests different brain regions dedicated to face and object recognition

Converging Evidence:
- Single-cell recording in monkey area IT in response to different stimuli (Bruce, Desimone and Gross, 1981)
- fMRI activity in response to faces relative to objects (Kanwisher et al., 1997) 
- Ishai et al. (1999) - see slide 2, p. 9 lecture notes

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo