Perception of Visual Motion

25 important questions on Perception of Visual Motion

Who is the classic Akintopsia patient?

Patient LM
- 43 year old patient
- vascular abnormality (superior sagittal sinus thrombosis)
---> felt like she was moving even when she was stationary

What is cerebral akinetopsia?

The inability to perceive visual motion
- you see broken up movement, like a series of snapshots (i.e. not a continuous flow of movement)
- for these patients, all activity must be extremely slow & cautious

What intact functions does LM still have?

Normal intelligence and memory

Her visual fields are not impaired. She has normal visual acuity, depth perception and spatial contrast sensitivity.

---> she can see the visual field, she just can't see movement 
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What sort of problems might someone with akinetopsia experience in everyday life?

- driving
- sports
- crossing the street
- watching TV
- socialising (people suddenly appear & disappear)
- interacting with other moving objects - they can't judge the speed (e.g. stepping on an escalator)

What does VEP demonstrate with regards to cerebral akinetopsia?

Normal visual evoked potential (VEP) to reversing checkerboard (see slide 1 on p. 2 of notes)
- shows signals from light stimuli are still coming through - pathways (e.g. retina and optic raditaions) are still intact
= not a problem with the early processing (V1 is still intact)

Patient LM can draw; however, what can she not see when she is drawing?

Her hand while drawing the lines

Who tested the motion perception ability of akinetopsia patients? What did they find?

Zihl, et al (1983)

Examined patient LM

Results:
- No perception of motion above 14 degrees/second
- Impaired discrimination of the direction or speed of moving objects (LM's aspect of movement is impaired)

- Most apparent for high speeds (> 20 deg/s) but also hesitant to report lower speed movement

- Above 7 deg/s her performance declines (she is okay with slower moving objects) ---> to LM, things above 7 deg/s still look like they are around 7/10 deg/s

(see slides 5 & 6 p. 2 for graph)

Who demonstrated that akinetopsia patients have impaired interaction with moving objects?

Schenk et al., 2000

Akinetopsia patients fail almost every time after 0.6m/s

Interaction with moving objects = you always need updates of info to adjust your movements accordingly

LM cannot interact well with moving objects; however, what 2 things can she detect?

- She can detect motion in other sensory modalities (e.g. a stroke on the arm)

- Distinguish biological from non-biological motion but cannot detect the overall direction of movement (McLeod et al., 1996) - slide 3 p. 3 of notes

What is the doppler effect?

The relative shift in frequency of waves that results from a moving source (or receiver)

---> Source moves towards receiver = frequency compression
---> Source moves away from receiver = frequency expansion

LM was the 1st case to show what?

That movement vision can be selectively impaired after brain damage

Where is the deficit in cerebral akinetopsia?

- Intact V1
- Large bilateral lesions: posterior and lateral portions of middle temporal gyrus
- MT = V5 (Temporo-occipito-parietal-junction)

Apart from V5 what other areas are also involved in motion perception?

V5 is surrounded by satellite areas which are also involved with processing motion-related information
(Zeki, 1980; Maunsell and Van Essen, 1983; Desimone and Ungerleider, 1986)

What did Gilaie-Dotan et al. (2013) test?

Tested motion perception (motion coherence) with five patients with lesions to either right (n = 3) or left (n = 2) ventral visual pathway = not all lesions
overlapped with V5.

---> Patients with right ventral visual lesions had impaired motion perception
= additional cortical regions are required to support motion perception

Motion perception deficits have also been associated with what part of the brain? (not associated with V5)

The cerebellum

What 3 things could underlie LM's preserved minimal motion perception?

  • Intact V1
  • Some functional sparing of V5 (though this seems unlikely)
  • Intact higher-order visual cortical areas

         ---> other sites in the cortex which are interconnected with V5 compensate deficit of V5 = LM's brain has managed to rearrange itself - example of neural plasticity

What are 3 principal regions of the cortex activated by motion in LM?

- left lingual and fusiform gyri
- precuneus
- cuneus

In contrast to normal subjects, there was no significant activation of area VI or V2 i.e. LM's visual processing is not in the same areas as the neural typcial population

What did Vaina et al. (2000) measure and what did they find?

50 stroke patients and 85 control participants examined on a motion coherence task

Results:
- Increased threshold for motion detection in Group II patients
- Normal motion detection thresholds for patients with only occipito-temporal or anterior frontal lesions

What did Zeki (1974) study?

Recorded the response of single neurons in monkeys to simple visual stimulation

Results: Cells found in V5/MT that were specialised for visual motion.
(specialised = the preferred movement in one direction)

What is a benefit and a limitation of Zeki's (1974) study?

Benefit:
- single cell recording = good spatial resolution & specificity

Limitation:
- monkeys not humans

What did Newsome et al., 1985; Newsome and Pare, 1988 study?

They lesioned MT in monkeys to see if they could still identify what direction dots were moving in

Results:
After lesion, 100% coherence in order to detect movement

- details of a similar exp (Stevens et al. 2009) p. 204 neuropsychology textbook

Unlike patients such as LM whose akinetopsia is chronic, the monkeys recovered normal motion detection thresholds after a few days - why is this?

The lesions in the monkeys were deliberate and thus more constrained - they were given a very specific lesion (there are other satalite areas that can compensate for the deficit)
---> LM's lesion was also in other areas

What did Tootell et al. (1999) find?

Used fMRI to test reaction between moving vs. static visual images

Results: increased activation in V5 (also increased activation in V2) with moving visual images

Benefits of imaging evidence

- neurotypical population processes info in this way
- purely correlational - says what the brain is doing

What did Beckers & Zeki (1995) study and what did they find?

TMS applied from 60 ms before to 100 ms after the moving stimulus onset

TMS over V5 induced transient deficits in motion perception if applied -10 to + 10 ms after onset

What are the benefits of using TMS?

- cause and effect info
- investigators can vary the timing of the magnetic pulses ---> knowing when a disruption occurs can help locate where it is occurring 
- temporary (allows repetition on the same participant to see if there is the same results in different conditions) = good exp. control

(more info p. 206 neuropsychology)

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo