Flat organizations - Martela et al
8 important questions on Flat organizations - Martela et al
In the article of Martela et al Weber's bureaucracy, Mintzberg's adhocracy and SMO's are compared, among other things based on basic structural arrangements, managerial power over subordinates and decision making power. What is the difference between these three organizations?
Bureaucracy: Hierarchical
Adhocracy: Matrix
SMO: Flat
- Managerial power
Bureaucracy: Extensive
Adhocracy: Loosened, especially within teams
SMO: Radical decentralization
- Decision making
Bureaucracy: Hierarchical
Adhocracy: Selective decentralization
SMO: Radical decentralization
We can also compare the three types of organization with each other based on Provision of reward, including rewarding desired behavior and eliminating free riding. Elaborate about the difference between bureaucracy, adhocracy and SMO.
- Reward desired behavior
Bureaucracy: monetary systems, bonus systems, advancement options etc.
Adhocracy: team-based bonus
SMO: monetary compensation with salary levels and bonuses through peer-based process.
- Eliminate free riding
Bureaucracy: supervisors responsible for monitoring actions and output.
Adhocracy: supervisor responsible for monitoring. Team members are accountable for each other
SMO: employees accountable for and monitored by each other.
What is the difference between bureaucracy, adhocracy and SMO regarding provision of information, including direction setting and coordination of interdependent tasks?
Bureaucracy: strict task boundaries and precise instructions.
Adhocracy: teams have necessary information needed for doing the work. The rest is for the manager.
SMO: Transparency about all key information
- Coordination of interdependent tasks
Bureaucracy: Standardized procedures and top-down task allocation and monitoring.
Adhocracy: Within team through constant communication, within-function is hierarchically.
SMO: Within team through constant communication, and within function through coordination roles and IT systems.
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
What are the three boundary conditions which describe the context in which SMO are most likely to have competitive advantage? (These can also be considered to be the contingency factors)
- Output customization
- Proactive workforce (ethics, motivation, expertise)
What are the three drawbacks of SMO's?
2. Homophily --> attract people that are alike
3. Difficult to determine long-term strategy.
Why do self-managing organizations become more relevant? (3 reasons)
2. Increasing usage of IT -systems
3. Increasing professional workforce
To achieve the goals, organizations must overcome four universal problems. What are the four universal problems as discussed by Martela?
2. Task allocation
3. Provision of rewards (including promoting desired behavior and eliminating free riding)
4. Provision of information (including direction setting and coordinating interdependent tasks)
How does Martela et al define self-managing organizations?
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding