B Criteria for grouping

7 important questions on B Criteria for grouping

Given a set of positions, designed in terms of specialization, formalization, and training and indoctrination. Two obvious questions face the designer of the organizational structure.

  • Define those two questions: 

  • How should these positions be grouped into units?

  • How large should each unit be?

A number of studies that have focused on the relationships among specific operating tasks stress one conclusion:

  • Grouping of operating tasks should reflect natural workflow interdependencies.

Work-flow interdependencies are not, of course, the only ones to be taken into consideration by the designer of organization structure. A second important class of interdependence relates to the processes used in the word flow.

For example, one lathe operator may have to consult another, working on a different product line, about what cutting tool to use on a certain job.

  • What is the positive result of process interdependency?

  • When specialists are grouped together, they learn from each other.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

The third criterion for grouping relates to economics of scale.

Groups may have to be formed to reach sizes large enough to function efficiently.

Scale interdependices.

  • Provide an example:      

  • Every department in the factory requires maintenance.

  • But that does not necessarily justify attaching one maintenance man to each department, grouping him by workflow. There may not be enough work for each maintenance man.

  • So a central maintenance department may be set up for the whole factory.

  • This of course encourages process specialization: whereas the maintenance man in each department would have to be a jack of all trades, the one among many in a maintenance department can specialize, for example, in preventive maintenance.

Grouping by function - by knowledge, skill, work process, or work function - reflects an overriding concern for process and scale interdependencies (and perhaps secondarily for social interdependencies), generally at the expense of those of the workflow.

Grouping on a functional basis has advantages.

  • Name two:
 

  • The organization can pool human and material resources across different workflows.

  • Functional structure also encourages specialization, by establishing career paths for specialists within their own area of expertise.

Market grouping: knowledge, skill, work process and function. By the means; the functions it uses to produce its products and services.

In general, the market structure is a less machine-like structure, less able to do a specialized or repetitive task well.

  • What are the advantages of market grouping?

  • It can do more tasks.

  • It can change tasks more easily, its essential flexibility servicing from the fact that its units are relatively independent of each other.

  • Units are relatively independent of each other, new units can easily be added and old ones deleted.

    • Any one store in a retail chain can easily be closed down, usually with little effect on the others. But closing down one specialized department in a large store may bankrupt it.

Grouping by function.

The functional structure lacks a built-in mechanism for coordinating the workflow.

  • Name the disadvantage that results from this statement above:

  • When sales drop, who is at fault?

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo