Diagnosing the need for change - Cornelissen et al., The contraction of meaning: the combined effect of communication, emotions and materiality on sense making
5 important questions on Diagnosing the need for change - Cornelissen et al., The contraction of meaning: the combined effect of communication, emotions and materiality on sense making
Cornelissen et al., (2014) did research on commitment to a frame under high pressure. Sensemaking and sense giving were important aspects. What's the difference?
Sense giving; influence sense making and meaning constructions of the other.
Cornelissen et al. (2014) argue the commitment to a frame is determined by communicative grounding, emotional contagion and material anchoring. Explain communicative grounding.
Communicative grounding; this is about the interaction between persons. It's about the language used. This overall communicative grounding process involves three subprocesses:
- Linguistic framing; the dialogue in which sense making and sense giving start.
- Grounding; communication connects with past instances of sense giving and sense making
- Job orientation; the collective nature of the process. Here, the frame starts to build up.
Thus, the cognitive frame is settle as part of the ongoing communication.
Cornelissen et al (2014) argue commitment to a frame is determined by communicative grounding, emotional contagion and material anchoring. Explain emotional contagion.
The emotional contagion is about the spread and strengthening of same emotions over time. The collective comes to share the same emotional state; ripple effect: emotions transferred across actors come to consume the entire collective. Three steps:
- Emotional erousal; positive or negative emotions.
- Contagion; energy level.
- Emotional state; parallel to the communicative grounding, the repetition and reinforcement of similar emotions leads to spreading and strengthening of emotions into a shared emotional state.
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Cornelissen et al (2014) argue commitment to a frame is determined by communicative grounding, emotional contagion and material anchoring. Explain the latter.
What is commitment as argued by Cornelissen et al (2014)
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
![Trustpilot Logo](/images/design_2020/lp/clp-trustpilot-en.png)