Hypothesis Testing and CL in Multiple Regression

7 important questions on Hypothesis Testing and CL in Multiple Regression

What about a hypothesis test on a single coefficient?

By the law of large numbers, sample average converge to their population counterparts. Nothing is basically different from single regressions. Still: standard error, t-statistic and p-value. The sampling distribution of Beta is approximately normal, in large samples. Do note that by testing we hold the other factors constant.

Confidence intervals work exactly the same B +/- SE*critical value

Single restriction but not zero while checking for other variables?

What if you want to test the effect whether the first and second beta are the same?
1) Directly by software
2) Transform regressors into one by changing the formula by subsequently adding and subtracting.

What about confidence sets for multiple coefficients?

To to so we usually construct a CONFIDENCE ELLIPSE. If it does not include the 0,0 point it means that the null hypothesis can be rejected. Difficult to do this yourself as it requires you to construct all possible combinations.

IF the economic correlation is negative, the betas will be positively correlated in the ellipse. For example if X1 increase, X2 would decrease, this means that the beta is positive.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What about model specifications?

Starting point for a regression is to think of possible omitted variables, as overreliance of R2 or adjusted R2 is dangerous.

Omitted variable:
- At least one of the regressors is correlated with an ommited variable
- The omitted variable is a determinant of Y
This implies that the OLS estimators are inconsistent.
Note: this problem persists even in large samples.

How to check?
- Base specification: formula based on expert judgement, economic theory, also regarding control variables
- Alternative specification: alternative regressors due to mismeasurement or availability.
IF pretty much the same you can say your base is reliable.

What about R2 and adjusted R2 in practice?

Yes they tell you how good the regressors are at predicting Y. But there are pitfalls:
- An increase does not necessarily mean that an added variable is statistically significant (remember: sample uncertainty)
- A high number does not mean that the regressors are a true CAUSE of the dependent variable (coincidence exists and correlation does not imply a causal relation)
- High/low number is not related to omitted variable
- High number does not necessarily mean that you have the most appropriate set of regressors, nor does a low tell you that you have an inappropriate set (economic theory remains most important)

What about analyzing the data?

Use a proper scale that is EASY to read and INTERPRET. Switch control variables to compare effects. Also think about units to present, thousands vs. millions.

Best way to present is to put all results in a table to get easy comparison. Using asteriks to highlight statistically significant results and putting the SE in brackets so everyone would be able to construct a t-statistic. Intercept can be labelled constant.

What about a discussion?

Review the controlling variables
- Are they important contributors?
- No need fro them to be statistically significant
- If adding another doesn't make a difference, you can say that it is redundant for this analysis.

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo