Research Programmes & Methodological Anarchy

21 important questions on Research Programmes & Methodological Anarchy

What was the approach of Imre Lakatos?

Tried to combine normative approach of falsificationism with descriptive approach Kuhn, and criticized them.

Where did Lakatos agree about with Popper?

Blind commitment to a theory is not an intellectuel virtue, it is an intellectual crime.

How did Lakatos respond to Popper and Kuhn?

- Lakatos agrees with Popper that theories cannot be proven.
- Lakatos agrees with Kuhn tot Popper's falsificationism is an oversimplified view of science, but rejects the conclusion that this leads to accepting the irrationality of scientific revolutions --> more refined falsificationist position.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What are the three varieties of falsificationism?

1. Dogmatic falsificationism.
2.  Methodological falsificationism.
3. Sophisticated falsificationism.

What are the two false assumptions of dogmatic falsificationism?

1. Distinction between theoretical and observational statements.
--> Observation is theory laden.
2. If a statement is a true observational statement, it is proven from facts.
--> Since all theoretical statements are fallible, and factual statements cannot be distinguished form theoretical statements, factual statements are fallible to.

How does science grow according to Braithwaite?

Science grows by overthrowing theories with hard facts.

What is wrong with the demarcation criterion of Dogmatic Falsificationism?

Too narrow, many good scientific theories do not forbid certain states of affairs. If we can save a theory from a failed prediction by introducing an ad hoc hypothesis, the theory did not forbid the observation.

What is the main point of Methodological Falsificationism?

Obervational statements are not neutral but fallible, but it is basic because it is part of a well-corroborated theory. (In testing X, we assumy Y. If test is negative, not X wrong, since the fault might be with Y).

What are the problems (3) with Methodological Falsificationism?

- Decision to accept one statement over another seems arbitrary.
- A test in science is not a two-way fight between theory and experiment, but a three-way fight between two rival theories and the experiment.
- Falsificationism is not the only outcome of a test.

What are the three demands for scientific growth (Sophisticated Falsificationism)?

1. New theory predicts novel facts.
2. Explains previous success old theory.
3. Is to a certain extent corroborated.

What are two main points of Sophisticated Falsificationism?

- We don't judge single theories are (un)scientific, but series of theories.
- Series of theories are not separated by unbridgeable gaps, instead they exhibit continuity.

What are the two sets of methodological rules:

1. Some tell us what paths of research to avoid (negative heuristics).
2. Some tell us what paths to pursue (positive heuristics).

What are the two ways to modify protective belt:

1. Degenerative programme: piling on too many ad hoc hypothesis --> no progress.
2. Progressive programme: modifying the belt leads to new hypothesis --> promising.

What is the difference between a degenerative programme and a progressive programme?

Risky predictions of novel facts.

What are three grounds on which charges of irrationality have been levelled at Kuhn by Lakatos?

1. Kuhn argues that other motives than rational deliberation play a role in scientific revolutions.
2. Kuhn argues that the choice between paradigms is a community decision.
3. Kuhn;s notion of incommensurability: idea that rational comparison between 2 paradigms is impossible.

What does 'Against Method' mean? (Feyerabend)

Challenge of monopoly scientific method. The more methods being used, the better it is.

We should we not accept one theory/method over another?

1. If we a priori exclude any theory, we might miss the facts generated by contradictory theories.
2. Plurality opinion beneficial: humanitarian aspect.

What are the consequences of methodological anarchism?

- Pleads for seperation science and state, just as seperation state and church.
- No demarcation criterion, every method can provide knowledge.

Approach methodological Anarchism?

If we want to gain knowledge, we should not restrict ourselves to just one method --> no progress.

How did Alan Sokal took on all constructivists at once?

By arguing that there are facts and that it's the scientist's job to find them.

What happens if one accepts total freedom according to Sokal?

We both lose science and morality.

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo