Objectivity, Values, and the Possibility of a Social Science - Impartiality and Theory Choice
3 important questions on Objectivity, Values, and the Possibility of a Social Science - Impartiality and Theory Choice
What does Rudner argue about the risk of an error?
Hypotheses are never proven definitively by any kind of test; they are more or less probable. The possibility of this is the "p-value". There will always be mistakes, depending on how strict you measure
Which three kinds of objectivity does Crasnow distinguish?
As freedom from bias = non-epistemic values from moral or political values that influence
As intersubjectivity = ≠ subjectivity; it is open for critical scrutiny for more than one person
As reliability = the reliability in the sense of scientific methods
As intersubjectivity = ≠ subjectivity; it is open for critical scrutiny for more than one person
As reliability = the reliability in the sense of scientific methods
What does Helen Longino argue?
The social character of science can protect against bias: objectivity requires mechanisms for public critique from a diverse range of voices
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
