Home / Summaries / Planning theory / planning-authors-public

Readings in Planning Theory: Introduction: The Structure and Debates of Planning Theory - Susan S. Fainstein and James DeFilippis

Q: What is the debate surrounding the concept of a singular 'public interest' in planning?

The debate centers on whether a single, identifiable 'public interest' exists and whether planners can recognize and serve it. Incremental planners argue that complexity makes it unrealistic to discover the public interest, while advocate planners contend that it often represents the interests of the privileged. The challenge is to reconcile a common public interest with diverse communities.

10 important questions on Readings in Planning Theory: Introduction: The Structure and Debates of Planning Theory - Susan S. Fainstein and James DeFilippis

What is the primary purpose of the article by Susan S. Fainstein and James DeFilippis?

The primary purpose of the article is to define the boundaries of planning theory and address the key issues faced by planners as both theorists and practitioners.

Why is defining planning theory considered challenging?

Defining planning theory is challenging due to several reasons, including its overlap with various social sciences and design disciplines, differing approaches that focus on object or method, and the division between explanatory and normative perspectives.

What is the central question the authors (Fainstein & DeFillips) see in planning theory?

The central question in planning theory, according to the authors, is: "What role can planning theory play in developing the good city and region within the constraints of a capitalist political economy and varying political systems?"

Why do the authors (Fainstein & DeFillips) argue that planning theory is essential for planning practice?

The authors argue that planning theory informs and improves planning practice by providing a theoretical understanding of processes shaping spaces and places, which is essential for predictive planning.

How do the authors (Fainstein & DeFillips) position planning theory in their approach?

The authors position planning theory at the intersection of political economy, history, and philosophy, considering macro-scale forces and the relationship between the city/region and planning as a human activity.

What are the four eras characterizing the history of modern city planning?

The four eras characterizing the history of modern city planning are:

The formative years (late 1800s to World War I).
The period of institutionalization, professionalization, and regional/national planning (ca. 1920–45).
The postwar era of standardization, crisis, and diversification of planning (1945–75).
The time up to the present, redefining planning in relation to the private sector and emphasizing the planner as a mediator, strategist, and advocate in public–private partnerships.

How has planning shifted its focus from outcomes to procedures over the years?

Planning initially focused on outcomes, but in the twentieth century, it increasingly emphasized procedures. This shift involved the development of methodologies, quantification, and the "rational model." Later, it evolved into the communicative model and the concept of the "just city."

What is the role of values in planning, and why are they challenging to apply?

Values play a crucial role in planning but present challenges because planners must decide whom they serve, deal with uncertainty, and address a wide range of social, economic, and environmental challenges. Planners' values often come from their backgrounds and cultures, creating tensions in planning.

What is the debate surrounding the concept of a singular "public interest" in planning?

The debate centers on whether a single, identifiable "public interest" exists and whether planners can recognize and serve it. Incremental planners argue that complexity makes it unrealistic to discover the public interest, while advocate planners contend that it often represents the interests of the privileged. The challenge is to reconcile a common public interest with diverse communities.

What are some significant advances in planning theory over the years?

Significant advances in planning theory include a changing understanding of power, communicative action, and the planner's role, as well as considerations of modernization, diversity, equity, democracy, and community. Concepts like sustainability, resilience, and complexity have also been explored. Planning theory aims to update planning practices to align with urban phenomena and social theories from other fields.

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

Planning theory

View summary

A unique study and practice tool
Never study anything twice again
Get the grades you hope for
100% sure, 100% understanding

Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.

Readings in Planning Theory: Introduction: The Structure and Debates of Planning Theory - Susan S. Fainstein and James DeFilippis

10 important questions on Readings in Planning Theory: Introduction: The Structure and Debates of Planning Theory - Susan S. Fainstein and James DeFilippis

What is the primary purpose of the article by Susan S. Fainstein and James DeFilippis?

Why is defining planning theory considered challenging?

What is the central question the authors (Fainstein & DeFillips) see in planning theory?

Why do the authors (Fainstein & DeFillips) argue that planning theory is essential for planning practice?

How do the authors (Fainstein & DeFillips) position planning theory in their approach?

What are the four eras characterizing the history of modern city planning?

How has planning shifted its focus from outcomes to procedures over the years?

What is the role of values in planning, and why are they challenging to apply?

What is the debate surrounding the concept of a singular "public interest" in planning?

What are some significant advances in planning theory over the years?

Summaries related to Why do planning theory? - John Friedmann

Planning theory

Global politics

Essentials of international relations

Behavioral genetics

Management and organisational behaviour

Follow Up Engels idioom 4/5 H

International Business

Marketing fundamentals

Projectmanagement, A practical Approach-Engl…

Basic Management Accounting for the Hospital…

International business

Organization theory and design