Bureaucratic reform and why WUAs?
14 important questions on Bureaucratic reform and why WUAs?
Why do we need bureaucratic reform in WUAs?
What types of reform have been tried?
For which problems are WUAs a solution?
First wave was not very successful in addressing the problems, as it was focussed too much on the engineering principles.
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
What are internatinal trends in irrigation water management?
- Upwards along the hydraulic ladder (upscaling, e.g. The main canal or Internationally)
- Outwards across disciplines (now: next to engineering, political, social science, etc).
What are the antecedents to these international trends in irrigation?
- Colonial agriculture in the 19th century (irrigation schools, study tours by engineers, etc)
- After WOII: American based internationalisation
What were the two reactions two desillusionment in 1970s, due to disfunctioning of irrigation systems?
2. More attention for institutional/organisational aspect (train farmer to use tech in proper way)
Why did states play central role in irrigation from WW2-1980s?
- Time of decolonalization.
- Control people: settle them before you can tax them.
- Socialist regimes
- Private sector in the South lacked capital and private sector --> state
- Economies in scale: only state has the money for these large scale irrigation projects
- Large infrastructure works to build Nations
- See other reasons on the slide
What is the hydraulic mission based on the definition of Theodore Roosevelt? (1900-1980)
By whom were WUAs created and what objectives did they serve? Which of these has priority?
See slide
Have WUAs improved irrigation system performance?
What contribution have WUAs made to facilitate system turnover and enhance political participation?
Are there other participatory approaches that donors might support if WUA approach is irreparably flawed
What are the differences between management and governance, if any? When did this shift take place? What was the result for WUAs?
During 1990s: governance as something different than management
Governance = about making the rules, being in control of the water system
Management = about doing the service provision (more about implementation of rules/decisions)
Old WUA: users invited to participate in management, but NOT in governance. Users are performing all tasks themselves
New WUA (Ostrom): users involved in governance from the start, can choose to outsource management functions.
What is another major paradigm shift in the 1990s?
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding